White Sox Interactive Forums
Minor Observations

Welcome
Go Back   White Sox Interactive Forums > Baseball Discussions > Minor Observations
Home Chat Stats Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2004, 12:24 PM
Randar68 Randar68 is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,009
Default Jim Callis on Sox Trading Prospects, Attn: Wealz.

From his latest "Ask BA" segment at Baseball America.


Quote:
Has any other team traded more prospects over the last two years than the White Sox? How would you rank their current top five prospects?

Scott Reimers
Springfield, Ill.


Other clubs have been active on the trade market, such as the Red Sox and Royals, and the Marlins moved a lot of talent to add Jeff Conine, Mark Redman and Ugueth Urbina to their championship club last year. But no team can match the sheer volume of legitimate prospects the White Sox have traded since the beginning of 2003.

General manager Kenny Williams has dealt 11 players who appeared in either the 2003 or 2004 edition of the 2004 Prospect Handbook: lefthanders Tim Bittner and Royce Ring; righthanders Edwin Almonte, Franklin Francisco, Jon Rauch and Josh Rupe; infielders Tim Hummel, Aaron Miles and Michael Morse; and outfielders Jeremy Reed and Anthony Webster. Those players helped bring in Roberto Alomar, Carl Everett (twice), Freddy Garcia, Scott Schoeneweis, Scott Sullivan and Jose Uribe. It's hard to argue with the moves, but they haven't delivered the White Sox to the postseason yet.

Right now, I'd rank Chicago's top five prospects in this order: outfielders Brian Anderson, Ryan Sweeney and Chris Young; third baseman Josh Fields (the Sox' 2004 first-round pick); and righthander Felix Diaz. I didn't include outfielder Joe Borchard because he's up with the big league club and soon will exceed the rookie limit of 130 at-bats. The other notable omission is righthander Kris Honel, who has pitched just six innings this year because of a tender elbow. I'd put him third on the list if I knew he'd return to health and regain his velocity, which dipped into the low 80s. Two other pitchers worth mentioning are sleeper righty Brandon McCarthy and lefty Gio Gonzalez, a supplemental first-round pick in June.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2004, 03:49 PM
Wealz Wealz is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randar68
From his latest "Ask BA" segment at Baseball America.
How many of those prospects were drafted during the Williams regime - and where would the system rate if Williams had hung on to his picks?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:44 PM
habibharu habibharu is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: champaign
Posts: 1,053
Default

wow i didnt think that young was thought of that highly! top 5?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:52 PM
maurice maurice is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bridgeport, Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by habibharu
wow i didnt think that young was thought of that highly! top 5?
IIRC, BA had Young in the Top 10 last year. With all the callups, trades, and injuries this year, there's an excellent chance that BA will place him in their Top 5. It has everything to do with Young's tools, not the overall strength of the system.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:52 PM
Wealz Wealz is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by habibharu
wow i didnt think that young was thought of that highly! top 5?
For an organization that drafted well, he wouldn't be.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-28-2004, 06:51 PM
jeremyb1 jeremyb1 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Flossmoor, IL/St. Paul, MN
Posts: 3,612
Default

Wow. I'd been sleeping on Young some. I'm not sure you have a strong system if he's in your top five but he looks like a strong sleeper of sorts. He may be very projectable Randar but he's also performing quite well at Kannapolis with a .261/.372/.512 and 25/31 in steal attempts. Guys with good power, plate discipline, and speed are good prospects and Young looks to have all three in spades. How's his defense regarded?

The only drawback is that 21 isn't particularly young for low A ball.
__________________
Jeremy Reed Watch

.252/.316/.343 for Seattle in 2005

23 for 58 with 4 2Bs, 7 BBs, and 3 SBs for Seattle in 2004

.305/.366/.455 with 13 SB in 15 Attempts at AAA Tacoma in 2004
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-28-2004, 08:44 PM
munchman33 munchman33 is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pilsen
Posts: 7,813
Default

Who is Jose Uribe?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-28-2004, 09:53 PM
WSox8404 WSox8404 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southwest side of Chicago
Posts: 1,733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by munchman33
Who is Jose Uribe?
Must be Juan's brother.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-28-2004, 11:49 PM
fuzzy_patters fuzzy_patters is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by munchman33
Who is Jose Uribe?
Jose Uribe played shortstop for the Giants in the 1980's, but I have no idea if he is related to Juan.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-29-2004, 03:04 AM
Chisoxfn Chisoxfn is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: California
Posts: 660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyb1
Wow. I'd been sleeping on Young some. I'm not sure you have a strong system if he's in your top five but he looks like a strong sleeper of sorts. He may be very projectable Randar but he's also performing quite well at Kannapolis with a .261/.372/.512 and 25/31 in steal attempts. Guys with good power, plate discipline, and speed are good prospects and Young looks to have all three in spades. How's his defense regarded?

The only drawback is that 21 isn't particularly young for low A ball.
He has great range in the outfield and gets good jumps on the ball. He has a "Johnny Damon" arm though, aka weak.
__________________
Dan Evans Sucks...I'll take Ken Williams any day of the week over that bum.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-29-2004, 11:41 AM
rdivaldi rdivaldi is online now
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago - South Loop
Posts: 2,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wealz
For an organization that drafted well, he wouldn't be.
Wealz that's just an uninformed, inflammatory statement. Your extreme bias is beginning to get old. Chris Young has a chance to be a 30/30 guy in A ball! That's extremely rare, especially for someone as young as him.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-29-2004, 11:43 AM
rdivaldi rdivaldi is online now
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago - South Loop
Posts: 2,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyb1
The only drawback is that 21 isn't particularly young for low A ball.
Actually he's still 20, won't be 21 for another 2 months. He's definitely not old for A ball.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-29-2004, 12:40 PM
habibharu habibharu is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: champaign
Posts: 1,053
Default

rdivaldi, how does he project compared to a anderson or sweeney? is the upside on him greater than those players or about the same?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-29-2004, 01:11 PM
rdivaldi rdivaldi is online now
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago - South Loop
Posts: 2,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by habibharu
rdivaldi, how does he project compared to a anderson or sweeney? is the upside on him greater than those players or about the same?
That's a tough question. Personally I think he has the highest "athletic" upside of all of them. You just don't see too many 20 year olds in A ball have a shot at going 30/30. I do have concerns about his arm, which seems to be a bit suspect. He has the most power of the 3, and the best speed, and his "eye" seems to have improved dramatically as the season has progressed. He does whiff too much, but he also draws a ton of walks.

In defense of Anderson and Sweeney though, both have been competing at higher levels and Sweeney is also a full year younger. I think someone who has seen more of him would have a better feel of his ceiling. My exposure to his play is limited. I wouldn't dare rate one ahead of the other right now but it's a nice problem to have.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-31-2004, 02:49 PM
dasox24 dasox24 is offline
WSI Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdivaldi
Actually he's still 20, won't be 21 for another 2 months. He's definitely not old for A ball.
Yep, and, iirc, he also had an injury at the beginning of his first year with the organization, so that set him back a year.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.




Design by: Michelle

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site-specific editorial/photos Copyright ©2001 - 2008 White Sox Interactive. All rights reserved.