|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Do your own homework.
__________________
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by OEO Magglio; 07-16-2004 at 11:22 PM. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Take a look at this taken from his bio: Quote:
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are definitely some players KW has traded (obviously Reed in particular) that I think we sorely miss.
__________________
Jeremy Reed Watch .252/.316/.343 for Seattle in 2005 23 for 58 with 4 2Bs, 7 BBs, and 3 SBs for Seattle in 2004 .305/.366/.455 with 13 SB in 15 Attempts at AAA Tacoma in 2004 |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Wealz won't answer what he wants, a strong MLB team willing to trade its prospects to win now, or a team that drafts, waits, and tries to develop players. You can't have it both ways. KW is clearly running things in the latter method, so bitching about the farm system clearly becomes the simplest reason to bitch and moan about things. like I said:
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Dan Evans Sucks...I'll take Ken Williams any day of the week over that bum. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
you don't understand this business one iota. KW's only had what, now 4 draft classes? How many of those would one reasonably expect to have mLB-ready talent? You still haven't answered, what's your pick: Quote:
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You're saying that the draft choices that Williams traded away is what is holding the system back? That's moronic. Reed, Ring, Hummell, Webster and Rupe? Ring, Hummell and Webster are much closer to fringe prospects than they are to impact prospects and Rupe is a project. Shaffer needs to go. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|