White Sox Interactive Forums
Sox Clubhouse
 Soxogram: 
GO SOX! DSNB!

Welcome
Go Back   White Sox Interactive Forums > Baseball Discussions > Sox Clubhouse
Home Chat Stats Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2004, 11:51 PM
voodoochile's Avatar
voodoochile voodoochile is online now
Soda Jerk/U.P.W./Lester Pooh Bear
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 54,896
Blog Entries: 9
Default 2006

This was mentioned in another thread and I wanted to give it a separate thread of its own.

The MLB CBA expires after the 2006 season. As the Sox roster is currently configured, there isn't a single player signed beyond that point. Yes, there are players who are locked in because of years of service restrictions (Crede, Rowand (I think), Harris, Olivo) but all of the long term contracts the Sox are currently holding will expire at or before the end of that season.

Lee and Buehrle: Contracts run through 2006
Frank and Konerko: Guaranteed money through 2005. Frank gets 3.5M if he isn't back in 2006 or the team can keep him for 10M.
Maggs and Loaiza: Both FA after this season.

How many other teams in the league set up this way? Are the Sox an anomoly?

For me it is further proof that the Sox don't really give a crap about winning. I am getting ready for the mother of all Kids can play X (or whatever it is coming up to) and Reinsdorf lowering the payroll while the new guys develop.
__________________

Riding shotgun on the Sox bandwagon since before there was an Internet...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2004, 01:16 AM
nodiggity59 nodiggity59 is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,179
Default Re: 2006

Quote:
Originally posted by voodoochile
This was mentioned in another thread and I wanted to give it a separate thread of its own.

The MLB CBA expires after the 2006 season. As the Sox roster is currently configured, there isn't a single player signed beyond that point. Yes, there are players who are locked in because of years of service restrictions (Crede, Rowand (I think), Harris, Olivo) but all of the long term contracts the Sox are currently holding will expire at or before the end of that season.

Lee and Buehrle: Contracts run through 2006
Frank and Konerko: Guaranteed money through 2005. Frank gets 3.5M if he isn't back in 2006 or the team can keep him for 10M.
Maggs and Loaiza: Both FA after this season.

How many other teams in the league set up this way? Are the Sox an anomoly?

For me it is further proof that the Sox don't really give a crap about winning. I am getting ready for the mother of all Kids can play X (or whatever it is coming up to) and Reinsdorf lowering the payroll while the new guys develop.
]


Im sorry, what is the MLB CBA?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2004, 01:36 AM
StillMissOzzie StillMissOzzie is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lombard, IL
Posts: 5,734
Default Re: Re: 2006

Quote:
Originally posted by nodiggity59
]


Im sorry, what is the MLB CBA?
The Major League Baseball Collective Bargaining Agreement. It's that which defines rules for arbitration, free agency, what little revenue sharing/luxury tax is in effect, etc.

SMO
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2004, 01:43 AM
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 55,245
Blog Entries: 5
Default Re: Re: Re: 2006

Quote:
Originally posted by nodiggity59
]


Im sorry, what is the MLB CBA?

Quote:
Originally posted by StillMissOzzie


The Major League Baseball Collective Bargaining Agreement. It's that which defines rules for arbitration, free agency, what little revenue sharing/luxury tax is in effect, etc.

SMO
It's basically what the owners and players fight over every work stoppage.
__________________
#9

2015 Obligatory Attendance/Record Tracker
1-2

LAST GAME: May 22 - Sox 3, Twins 2
NEXT GAME: June 8 - Sox vs. Astros
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2004, 11:22 AM
RichFitztightly RichFitztightly is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lockport
Posts: 808
Default

Well, this is mainly the reason why the Blackhawks are so abysmal. Dollar Bill Wurtz wants as few people signed as possible under the old CBA. That's why he doesn't get any free agents. And why the team wouldn't be able to beat anyone from the minor leagues, save perhaps their own minor league team. It's very dis-heartening to hear this ownership is on the same path. I hope they don't follow suit. I don't know if the Hawks will ever recover from this disaster, and I don't know if the Sox would be able to recover any lost fan-base if this were to happen.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-05-2004, 11:36 AM
ode to veeck ode to veeck is offline
WSI Prelate
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: silicon valley, CA
Posts: 12,722
Default

if the sox don't thrash the flubbies in the WS by the end of 2006, the 100th anniversary of their great upset of the Tinkers to Evers to Chance Flubs, I'm through with 'em!! 40+ years of my devotion with no return is enough!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2004, 11:40 AM
SEALgep SEALgep is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,122
Default Re: 2006

Quote:
Originally posted by voodoochile
This was mentioned in another thread and I wanted to give it a separate thread of its own.

The MLB CBA expires after the 2006 season. As the Sox roster is currently configured, there isn't a single player signed beyond that point. Yes, there are players who are locked in because of years of service restrictions (Crede, Rowand (I think), Harris, Olivo) but all of the long term contracts the Sox are currently holding will expire at or before the end of that season.

Lee and Buehrle: Contracts run through 2006
Frank and Konerko: Guaranteed money through 2005. Frank gets 3.5M if he isn't back in 2006 or the team can keep him for 10M.
Maggs and Loaiza: Both FA after this season.

How many other teams in the league set up this way? Are the Sox an anomoly?

For me it is further proof that the Sox don't really give a crap about winning. I am getting ready for the mother of all Kids can play X (or whatever it is coming up to) and Reinsdorf lowering the payroll while the new guys develop.
You can look at it that way, or you can look it at as keeping options open. By that I mea if you lock up the wrong people you essentillay screw yourself over like Baltimore had done to itself for years. These coming years may be the time to lock up players to longer type deals. The market is down, and I figure to remain down for at least a couple more years. Now is the time for five and six year deals (to healthy people it makes sense for), not before when the prices were as high as they were.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2004, 01:19 PM
joecrede joecrede is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,340
Default

A pretty good website for team payrolls. Interestingly according to this site the Sox '04 payroll is actually higher than the Orioles.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.




Design by: Michelle

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site-specific editorial/photos Copyright ©2001 - 2008 White Sox Interactive. All rights reserved.