White Sox Interactive Forums
Sox Clubhouse
 Soxogram: 
Congratulations on the Rookie records for HR and RBI in April, Jose!

Welcome
Go Back   White Sox Interactive Forums > Baseball Discussions > Sox Clubhouse
Home Chat Stats Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2001, 12:00 PM
KempersRS KempersRS is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,395
Default This has me confused

Quote:
Q: Who do you think the Chicago White Sox are going to unload to lower their payroll? I have heard rumors of Magglio Ordonez. To me that would be a mistake. I would much rather see a Paul Konerko and James Baldwin go. Your thoughts? -- Chris McVady, Addison, Ill.
Gammons answers:
Quote:
PWG: I don't see how they can unload right now, because the wild card is not out of reach. Realistically, they probably cannot make it, but another white-flag deal would be a PR nightmare. However, they are not going to sign Ordonez long-term, and he and Keith Foulke each could be gone by Jan. 1.
I'm getting tired of seeing this, why is Maggs NOT getting a contract? I would like to see this from a new source, someone besisdes ESPN. If we lose these guys to FA, its not even worth watching next year. Trade Foulke is you just have to cut payroll, but don't let BOTH slip away into the market.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2001, 12:09 PM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 53,781
Blog Entries: 5
Default Gammons

A) I think he's just mad that we beat his Red Sox.

B) He likes to make trouble.

C) If Ordonez and Foulke go, this team is sunk. It will be a swift and painful trip to the cellar. I hope Mr. Reinsdorf likes having only 10,000 people show up to the games, because I guarantee that will be the average crowd if Ordonez and Foulke leave.
__________________
2014 Obligatory Attendance & Record Tracker

0-4

LAST GAME: May 31 - Padres 4, Sox 2
NEXT GAME: Sunday, August 4 - vs. Twins
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2001, 12:25 PM
Jerry_Manuel Jerry_Manuel is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hanover Park
Posts: 10,078
Default

I might be wrong but they are not free agents for a year or so. They are just arbitration eligible.



No they are coming to Boston you watch and see.

Last edited by Jerry_Manuel; 07-23-2001 at 12:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2001, 12:29 PM
Soxheads Soxheads is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,840
If they got rid of them both I would start to doubt being a Sox fan. I might be a 'stros fan.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2001, 12:45 PM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 53,781
Blog Entries: 5
Default I might be wrong, too...

Quote:
Originally posted by Jerry_Manuel
I might be wrong but they are not free agents for a year or so. They are just arbitration eligible.
I'm almost 100% positive that Foulke is arbitraton eligible after this season. As for Magglio, he signed a 1-year deal in the off-season, so he is an FA at the end of this year.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2001, 05:01 PM
Konerko05 Konerko05 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,612
Default

Quote:
I'm almost 100% positive that Foulke is arbitraton eligible after this season. As for Magglio, he signed a 1-year deal in the off-season, so he is an FA at the end of this year.
No, I'm pretty sure Magglio isn't a free agent until after the 2003 season. The only reason he signed a one year deal was to avoid arbitration.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2001, 05:04 PM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 53,781
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Konerko05
No, I'm pretty sure Magglio isn't a free agent until after the 2003 season. The only reason he signed a one year deal was to avoid arbitration.
Oh, ok. Thanks. Either way, though we HAVE to lock him up long term.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-23-2001, 05:41 PM
IA_soxfan IA_soxfan is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 895
Default

Quote:
Oh, ok. Thanks. Either way, though we HAVE to lock him up long term.

"Relax, I'm taking care of everything"

Aw crap. Bye bye maggs, you'll be missed.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-23-2001, 05:48 PM
Daver's Avatar
Daver Daver is offline
The Grand Wazoo
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SW Suburbs
Posts: 26,639
Blog Entries: 11
Default

Magglio signed a 1 year deal to avoid arbitration AND to give his agent and the Sox a full year to work out a long term deal,which is moving along at a normal pace as therer is no rush.
As far as Foulke goes(I'll hear hell about this)a 2 pitch pitcher is not worth 7-9 mil a season.Trade him.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-23-2001, 05:50 PM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 53,781
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by daver
As far as Foulke goes(I'll hear hell about this)a 2 pitch pitcher is not worth 7-9 mil a season.Trade him.
Yes, you will get hell about this. KEEP FOULKE!!!


Keep me! Keep me! Keep me!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-23-2001, 05:58 PM
IA_soxfan IA_soxfan is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 895
Default

Quote:
Magglio signed a 1 year deal to avoid arbitration AND to give his agent and the Sox a full year to work out a long term deal,which is moving along at a normal pace as therer is no rush.

Don't worry daver, I'll find some way to screw this up.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-23-2001, 06:00 PM
Daver's Avatar
Daver Daver is offline
The Grand Wazoo
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SW Suburbs
Posts: 26,639
Blog Entries: 11
Default

Let me ask you a question,was Robin Ventura an 8 mil a year ballplayer(at that economic time)when he left?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-23-2001, 06:08 PM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 53,781
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Ventura was expendable because we had a hot-shot minor leaguer (Crede) and a short-term replacement (Norton).

Who do we have in the minors to replace Foulke? Edwin Almonte? Who could fill in? Bobby Howry? Jon Garland?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-23-2001, 06:12 PM
Jjav829's Avatar
Jjav829 Jjav829 is offline
Parking Lot Attendant
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16,668
Blog Entries: 2
Default

I've heard Barcelo's name mentioned as a future closer. Im sort of with Daver here but not for the same reason. Foulke only has two pitchers, but Randy Johnson only has two also. However, hes a closer, and with Reinsdorf being unwilling to keep a high payroll until the attendance rises, if we give Foulke that much money we may lose another, more important player.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-23-2001, 06:19 PM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 53,781
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jjav829
I've heard Barcelo's name mentioned as a future closer. Im sort of with Daver here but not for the same reason. Foulke only has two pitchers, but Randy Johnson only has two also. However, hes a closer, and with Reinsdorf being unwilling to keep a high payroll until the attendance rises, if we give Foulke that much money we may lose another, more important player.
Barcelo is coming off like his 3rd surgery and he's only 23.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.




Design by: Michelle

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site-specific editorial/photos Copyright ©2001 - 2008 White Sox Interactive. All rights reserved.