White Sox Interactive Forums
 What's The Score?
Subscription Information
Clubhouse Chat
User Guide
Dictionary
Photo Gallery

Welcome
Go Back   White Sox Interactive Forums > Baseball Discussions > What's The Score?
Reload this Page Cubs get Haren for Marmol...or maybe not.
Home Chat Stats Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
Page 2 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-02-2012, 09:43 PM
DumpJerry's Avatar
DumpJerry DumpJerry is offline
Tom Feargal Hagen
  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The hearts and minds of Sox fans on 10-26-05
Posts: 25,735
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by 34rancher View Post
And now trade is off. Wonder who backed out.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...,2929651.story
Haren mentioned that death was an option.
__________________

All hail The Rick
‎
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-02-2012, 09:44 PM
DrCrawdad DrCrawdad is offline
WSI High Priest
  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valley Of The Malls
Posts: 7,324
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai_sox View Post
Since when did the Cubs change their name to the Chicago Theos? All I'm seeing out of cubs fans is "Great job Theo!" "Go Theo!"
Clearly you've been reading WSI since Theo was inaugurated with the Cubbies job.

WSI used to have the FOBB (Friends Of Billy Beane) we now need FOTE (Friends Of Theo Epstein).
__________________

DrCrawdad
"In time you can turn these obsessions into careers...Hurry Down Doomsday the bugs are taking over." - Elvis Costello
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-02-2012, 10:00 PM
JB98's Avatar
JB98 JB98 is offline
WSI Guru
  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 27,013
Default
Haren is in severe decline. Marmol is too unreliable to close for a contending team like the Angels.

Cub fans probably still think Haren is good. I don't think this deal would make sense for either side.
__________________
JB's attendance record:
2004: 14-5; 2005: 16-8; 2006: 19-10; 2007: 8-12; 2008: 15-7; 2009: 6-13; 2010: 12-11; 2011: 9-8; 2012: 11-7; 2013: 8-9; 2014: 2-1; Total: 120-91.
Next game: April 26 vs. Tampa Bay

Read my new baseball blog: http://thebaseballkid98.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-02-2012, 10:01 PM
Brian26's Avatar
Brian26 Brian26 is offline
WSI Guru
  
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 28,300
Blog Entries: 52
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by 34rancher View Post
And now trade is off. Wonder who backed out.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...,2929651.story
Watch out, I have to bust out my favorite Hawk tag:


"Welp....that didn't take long."
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-03-2012, 12:09 AM
DSpivack DSpivack is offline
WSI Guru
  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Evanston
Posts: 28,195
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB98 View Post
Haren is in severe decline. Marmol is too unreliable to close for a contending team like the Angels.

Cub fans probably still think Haren is good. I don't think this deal would make sense for either side.
Maybe the Angels figured they'd be better off just declining Haren's option instead of getting back Marmol.
__________________
Attendance records:
09 : 3-2.
10 : 2-3.
11: 0-1.
12: 2-1; Orlando Hudson and Alex Rios walkoffs.
14: 1-0; Opening Day 5-3 win vs Twins.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-03-2012, 12:24 AM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 52,946
Blog Entries: 5
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB98 View Post
Haren is in severe decline. Marmol is too unreliable to close for a contending team like the Angels.

Cub fans probably still think Haren is good. I don't think this deal would make sense for either side.
It really doesn't. What do the rebuilding Cubs want with a declining veteran and what does LA want with a ****ty reliever?
__________________
2014 Obligatory Attendance & Record Tracker

0-1

LAST GAME: April 12 - Indians 12, Sox 6
NEXT GAME: April 16 vs. Boston
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-03-2012, 08:07 AM
DSpivack DSpivack is offline
WSI Guru
  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Evanston
Posts: 28,195
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by doublem23 View Post
It really doesn't. What do the rebuilding Cubs want with a declining veteran and what does LA want with a ****ty reliever?
The Cubs can sign that declining veteran on their own now!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-03-2012, 02:33 PM
The Immigrant The Immigrant is offline
WSI Church Elder
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Old Irving Park
Posts: 4,160
Default
This thread needs more Nelson Muntz.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-04-2012, 11:48 PM
CoopaLoop CoopaLoop is offline
WSI Church Elder
  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Des Plaines
Posts: 1,689
Default
So is this deal dead? I couldn't believe someone would give up Haren for Carlos Marmol.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-05-2012, 12:51 AM
DSpivack DSpivack is offline
WSI Guru
  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Evanston
Posts: 28,195
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoopaLoop View Post
So is this deal dead? I couldn't believe someone would give up Haren for Carlos Marmol.
Yes, the Angels just declined the 2013 option on Haren's contract, instead of trading him for Marmol.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-05-2012, 07:17 PM
#1swisher #1swisher is offline
11 NFL 12&13PTC CHAMP
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 60610
Posts: 15,473
Default
Ken Rosenthal
Source: Marmol would have OK'ed trade to #Angels, but #Cubs pulled deal off table and trade is not happening. Angels talking to other clubs.
__________________
<font color=#0066cc>http://www.whitesoxinteractive.com/v...pic10971_3.gif</font>
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-06-2012, 01:01 PM
SCCWS SCCWS is offline
WSI Personality
  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,112
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1swisher View Post
Ken Rosenthal
Source: Marmol would have OK'ed trade to #Angels, but #Cubs pulled deal off table and trade is not happening. Angels talking to other clubs.
Supposedly Red Sox are very interested in Haren.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-06-2012, 01:04 PM
blandman blandman is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,482
Default
There is an assumption among executives that Haren failed a physical.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-06-2012, 01:35 PM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 52,946
Blog Entries: 5
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by blandman View Post
There is an assumption among executives that Haren failed a physical.
Wouldn't be surprising... Here's Haren's fastball the last 6 years:



woof
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-08-2012, 08:53 AM
Tragg Tragg is offline
WSI Prelate
  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gonzales LA
Posts: 12,578
Blog Entries: 2
Default
Marmol could easily be a "coop will fix em" type with his arm. He doesn't have to close. Decent chance with little risk - slow pitching past his prime starter.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.

Contact Us - FlyingSock.com - Archive - Code of Conduct - Top



Design by: Michelle

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site-specific editorial/photos Copyright ©2001 - 2008 White Sox Interactive. All rights reserved.