White Sox Interactive Forums
Minor Observations

Welcome
Go Back   White Sox Interactive Forums > Baseball Discussions > Minor Observations
Home Chat Stats Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2012, 12:58 PM
Huisj Huisj is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 3,425
Default Funny past prospect rankings

I came across this page on BaseballAmerica that shows their top 100 prospects lists from each year going back to 1990. It's pretty funny to go back and look at where people from the Sox were ranked and see who was similarly thought of at that time.

Here are some good ones:

2011:
84. Tanner Scheppers, rhp, Rangers
85. Brent Morel, 3b/ss, White Sox
86. Craig Kimbrel, rhp, Braves
I think some were underestimating Kimbrel's arm.

2007:
43. Joey Votto, 1b, Reds
44. James Loney, 1b, Dodgers
45. Josh Fields, 3b, White Sox

72. Gio Gonzalez, lhp, White Sox
73. Philip Humber, rhp, Mets


2006:
49. Ryan Braun, 3b, Brewers
50. Andrew McCutchen, of, Pirates
51. Brian Anderson, of, White Sox
Yeah, I wish.

2001:
36. Joe Crede, 3b, White Sox
37. Ben Christensen, rhp, Cubs
38. Jack Cust, of/1b, Diamondbacks
39. Bud Smith, lhp, Cardinals
40. Jacob Peavy, rhp, Padres
41. Adam Johnson, rhp, Twins
42. Albert Pujols, 3b, Cardinals
43. Aubrey Huff, 3b, Devil Rays
44. Matt Ginter, rhp, White Sox
This whole section cracks me up. The Crede-Pujols-Huff proximity and the Peavy-Ginter one too are just great.

2000:
63. Aaron Myette, rhp, White Sox
64. Adam Eaton, rhp, Padres
65. Ben Sheets, rhp, Brewers
If Myette could have been Adam Eaton, that would have been nice. If he had been Ben Sheets, whoa.

1998:
56. Magglio Ordonez, of, White Sox
57. Julio Ramirez, of, Marlins
Maybe this list was why Jerry Manuel insisted on playing him over and over at the start of 2001--he was supposed to be as good as Ordonez.

1994:
6. Alex Rodriguez, ss, Mariners
7. Manny Ramirez, of, Indians
8. James Baldwin, rhp, White Sox

1990:
29. Frank Thomas, 1b, White Sox
30. Tom Goodwin, of, Dodgers
31. Bob Hamelin, 1b, Royals
Yes indeed, Bob Hamelin was just a poor man's Frank Thomas.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2012, 02:22 PM
shingo10 shingo10 is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 765
Default

This goes to show that there is absolutely no thing as a baseball "expert."

And there never will be. Rankings and the like really don't mean much except for helping determine what kind of value they have in a trade.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2012, 02:46 PM
SephClone89 SephClone89 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oswego, IL
Posts: 5,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shingo10 View Post
This goes to show that there is absolutely no thing as a baseball "expert."
Well uh, no. That's not what this shows at all.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2012, 09:51 PM
shingo10 shingo10 is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SephClone89 View Post
Well uh, no. That's not what this shows at all.

Why don't you enlighten us then?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2012, 08:53 PM
SI1020 SI1020 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie
Posts: 4,238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shingo10 View Post
This goes to show that there is absolutely no thing as a baseball "expert."

And there never will be. Rankings and the like really don't mean much except for helping determine what kind of value they have in a trade.
It is much harder to predict who will make it in baseball, compared to say football and basketball players.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2012, 09:47 PM
Bucky F. Dent Bucky F. Dent is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Westfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,581
Default

James Baldwin, #8! Yow! That was a miss.
__________________
It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone. - A. Bartlett Giamatti
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:18 PM
rdivaldi rdivaldi is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago - South Loop
Posts: 2,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shingo10 View Post
This goes to show that there is absolutely no thing as a baseball "expert."
I echo the sentiment that this statement is a bit out of bounds. If there were no baseball experts then there would be no use for scouting. You could just throw darts at player's names and do the draft that way.

Just because players are missed in top 100's is no reason to dismiss "experts".
__________________
<a href=http://www.whitesoxinteractive.com/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=3256 target=_blank>http://www.whitesoxinteractive.com/v...achmentid=3256</a>

March 16, 2005 - Another happy Sox fan joins the party!
July 6, 2012 - 7 years later he's still part of it...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2012, 05:33 PM
Domeshot17 Domeshot17 is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minooka
Posts: 8,901
Default

Its also a ranking of "Prospects". You realize the term prospects derives from the word Prospective. Some guys, like Pujols, just did not fully put it together until they got to the Bigs. It is very cool to look back on, but some average fan that put together a blind top 100 would not do any better but almost surely far worse.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2012, 08:54 AM
floridafan floridafan is offline
WSI Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 19
Default

I have never been a real fan of Baseball America's Ranking process...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-06-2012, 08:48 PM
shingo10 shingo10 is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdivaldi View Post
I echo the sentiment that this statement is a bit out of bounds. If there were no baseball experts then there would be no use for scouting. You could just throw darts at player's names and do the draft that way.

Just because players are missed in top 100's is no reason to dismiss "experts".

I'm not saying scouting isn't important I'm saying that there is no way to predict who is gonna to evolve and who is going to bust. There just isn't. That's why trades for prospects will always be a huge risk...some of them end up like Aaron Poreda and some of them end up like Gio Gonzales.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-06-2012, 11:18 PM
DSpivack DSpivack is offline
WSI Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Evanston
Posts: 28,195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shingo10 View Post
I'm not saying scouting isn't important I'm saying that there is no way to predict who is gonna to evolve and who is going to bust. There just isn't. That's why trades for prospects will always be a huge risk...some of them end up like Aaron Poreda and some of them end up like Gio Gonzales.
And I think that idea is wrong. That's exactly what scouting is. That's why some players are 1st round draft picks and others are 50th round draft picks. That most of those players fail in baseball is just pure statistics: hundreds of players are drafted every year, there are thousands of players in the minor leagues, but only a small handful of those will make the major leagues. That the best are wrong most of the time doesn't mean they are failing overall and there are no experts in the field, just as you wouldn't call every major league baseball player a failure because they fail in the majority of their at bats.
__________________
Attendance records:
09 : 3-2.
10 : 2-3.
11: 0-1.
12: 2-1; Orlando Hudson and Alex Rios walkoffs.
14: 1-0; Opening Day 5-3 win vs Twins.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-07-2012, 11:14 AM
SI1020 SI1020 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie
Posts: 4,238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSpivack View Post
And I think that idea is wrong. That's exactly what scouting is. That's why some players are 1st round draft picks and others are 50th round draft picks. That most of those players fail in baseball is just pure statistics: hundreds of players are drafted every year, there are thousands of players in the minor leagues, but only a small handful of those will make the major leagues. That the best are wrong most of the time doesn't mean they are failing overall and there are no experts in the field, just as you wouldn't call every major league baseball player a failure because they fail in the majority of their at bats.
No problem with what you say here. My contention is that if you studied football and basketball drafts over the years there would be a greater percentage of high draft picks making it in those sports than in baseball. Now, at this point I have neither the time nor the inclination to prove or disprove this. Perhaps someone has done it already, there are more "studies" about more subjects out there these days than ever it seems.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-07-2012, 08:07 PM
floridafan floridafan is offline
WSI Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 19
Default

Scouting is all about tools and size for position players. Scouting has a harder time with Heart, Passion, and a players ability to grind.

I think some Bonus Babies do not feel a need to Grind and display Passion. Others like Trout and Harper have shown that they have the make up to play hard everyday.

If you are not a top round pick the money is not there to be able to even afford to play the game in the minors without family support.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-07-2012, 10:09 PM
soxnut1018 soxnut1018 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
Scouting is all about tools and size for position players. Scouting has a harder time with Heart, Passion, and a players ability to grind.
Chicago tough.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-10-2012, 07:56 PM
TheVulture TheVulture is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Domeshot17 View Post
. Some guys, like Pujols, just did not fully put it together until they got to the Bigs.
Nah, Pujols wasn't ranked higher probably because he was in the low minors in his first professional season. He started in low A Midwest League in 2000, and was in the majors the next year. Meanwhile, Crede was coming off an impressive season at Birmingham.
__________________
A bad idea is better than no idea at all- Hawk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 AM.




Design by: Michelle

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site-specific editorial/photos Copyright ©2001 - 2008 White Sox Interactive. All rights reserved.