#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
His statement was a load of vague squirmy crap and the Brewers aren't going anywhere this season. He got off easy in my book. If the Brewers were in contention this year he'd be fighting it tooth and nail.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, pretty much everyone I know north of Kenosha.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So am I just a cynic, or does anyone else think this would have played out differently if the Brewers weren't 13.5 games out of a Wild Card spot?
__________________
"It's not the high price of stardom that bothers me...it's the high price of mediocrity." - Bill Veeck |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm...Braun gets suspended when-
1) His salary leaps up starting next season, so he doesn't lose as much by taking the suspension now, and the suspension doesn't carry into next season. 2) The Brewers are a lock to miss the postseason anyway, and losing Braun's presence in the lineup helps the Brewers tank for a better draft pick, and 3) Bud Selig runs baseball. Yeah, this isn't favoritism or anything like that at all.
__________________
Rock over London. Rock on, Chicago. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's complete and utter bs. Now the brewers get a chance to save money AND they get a better draft pick probably due to this. If they end up with the overall number one pick, then this suspension could confidently help them. Ugh
__________________
Do the white sox know that it is Designated Hitter, not Designated Out? |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Waiting for Braun to issue an apology to the poor courier he dragged through the mud a couple years ago. Yeah, not holding my breath.
__________________
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using that logic they might as well have just sat Braun for the year anyway in order to move up in the draft.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well you could at least give him the suspension he deserves. "Just until this season's over" is a load of bull****. They have a policy on PED use, they don't get to decide when to implement it or not.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think this is better than their policy. It was a pretty flimsy argument to try and suspend him for 100 games for a 2nd failed test when he was never convicted of a 1st failed test. 65 games is over the 50 game limit for 1st time users. This is the equivalent of a plea bargain and prevented this thing from dragging on and on for months as lawyers argued the semantics of the collective bargaining agreement.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think a team should lose its top draft pick if a player gets caught on their team. It's only way to keep them from looking the other way.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree completely with that idea if the way people were getting caught was representative of the league. Unfortunately though, the 2 largest ways people were caught in the majors at least were from a rat/whistleblower in an east coast dugout and a clinic in Florida. If people really thought the only cheaters were the people on the Mitchell report and those using the lab in Florida I have a bridge to sell you.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I really wish there was a legal way to allow these massive contracts revoked when these players are busted.
You think any player would dare even consider taking PEDs? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is that written into the CBA? I would think that there would be some clause along those lines.
__________________
Attendance records: 09 : 3-2. 10 : 2-3. 11: 0-1. 12: 2-1. 14: 2-3. 15: 3-3. 16: 1-0. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely.
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|