#196
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And what's with all the crazy Danks talk? It is very possible the team will be better without him. Who knows what to expect when he comes back. It won't matter if he does miss a month.
|
#197
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because the team admits EVEN IF HE IS HEALTHY he's probably not breaking camp with them. So the best case scenario is 15 days. BEST CASE. As in, not the most likely case. Jesus.
|
#198
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it's hard to say we wouldn't be better with a 100% healthy Danks. He's a hell of a pitcher.
|
#199
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is no mention of probably not breaking camp with the team. And no best case 15 days. You need to learn how to read.
|
#200
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read just fine, thanks. I'm pretty sure I know what the statement meant. And what the disabled list rules are. But thank you for your concern. It is unwarranted.
|
#201
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You must be trolling. You're wrong. Everyone knows it.
|
#202
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"Could mean" =/= "probably"
__________________
![]() "Nellie Fox, that little son of a gun, was always on base and was a great hit-and-run man. He sprayed hits all over." Yogi Berra in the New York Sunday News (July 12, 1970) |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dude. Just give it up. This is painful to watch.
__________________
#9 2015 Obligatory Attendance/Record Tracker 1-2 LAST GAME: May 22 - Sox 3, Twins 2 NEXT GAME: June 8 - Sox vs. Astros |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, they wrote it for hypothetical purposes.
I'm willing take any bets about Danks making his first turn in the rotation. Takers? |
#205
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know, right? Yikes...
__________________
![]() A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives- Jackie Robinson www.twitter.com/Spawn_03 |
#206
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No one here has stated definitively that Danks will be in the rotation when the season starts. You, on the other hand, are the only one here stating definitively that he won't. This includes media outlets, the coaching staff, pretty much everyone involved in the situation. I mean, you are the one stating he hasn't' begun throwing off of a mound to back your position, even though two links and a few tweets have stated otherwise..
|
#207
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm taking exception to someone calling me a liar because I raised the possibility. Because it is pretty likely. And it's not coming from no where. And calling me a liar for it is a personal attack. |
#209
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They said "could mean." You changed it to "probably." Those are very different, i.e., "It's getting cloudy, that could mean rain" is not the same as "it's getting cloudy, it will probably rain." "Could be" acknowledges a possibility. "Probably" means more likely than not.
Yet another new argument. Missing the first turn is not the same as missing the first month. |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It's not personal. You just won't admit you are currently incorrect, which seems to be frustrating people/logic.
__________________
Ridiculousness across all sports: (1) "You have no valid opinion because you never played the game." (2) "Stats are irrelevant. This guy just doesn't know how to win." |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|