|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why are the Sox so bad in signing and developing Latin American players? Not enough money? Not enough scouts? Bad scouts? Not enough contacts?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
No it's not. SIGNING them is expensive.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually it is. You have to pay for travel, and the scouts get paid a premium because they are spending extended amounts of time, 3-4 months, away from home. The Dodgers used to find a lot of talent there by using scouts that lived there, but they also got sold a bunch of lousy ball players by the same scouts taking payoffs.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's been tried, for the most part they can't be trusted, teams prefer to send someone they trust, to double check what they get from local scouts.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mod edit. DO NOT COPY AND PASTE COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL FROM PAY SITES> YOU WILL BE BANNED IF IT HAPPENS AGAIN.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where's that report from, is that from Baseball America's recent feature on international signings?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
yep...
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks. Did it say anything about who the Sox signed?
They always sign a whole bunch of guys and half of them never get reported. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
No one worth mentioning...
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
All were awful. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If they just signed these guys, which I'm assuming you meant, how can it be determined all were awful? |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Were any names mentioned in the report you read?
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I was able to determine that they were all awful by doing some research, looking up their stats, which I know is a novel idea, doing something for yourself when could wait for someone else to do it first but that's what I did. You could have done it as well, I even gave you the names all you had to do was search for them but instead you just posted "I don't understand". |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|