White Sox Interactive Forums
Talking Baseball

Welcome
Go Back   White Sox Interactive Forums > Baseball Discussions > Talking Baseball
Home Chat Stats Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2012, 07:23 PM
chicagowhitesox1 chicagowhitesox1 is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Aurora Illinois
Posts: 1,058
Default Buster Posey and Miguel Cabrera win MVP

Both were landslides and I can see Posey winning by a large margin but I really expected the AL voting to be alot closer. I feel Trout was the real MVP for the AL though.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2012, 09:05 PM
SephClone89 SephClone89 is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oswego, IL
Posts: 6,039
Default

22 to 6 in first place voting is a disgrace.
__________________
Attendance Records

2014: 4-8 plus Fenway and HOF weekend
2013: 4-6 plus St. Louis and Milwaukee
2012: 7-4
2011: 6-4 plus NYC parks and Minnesota
2010: 5-6
2009: 2-4 plus Pittsburgh

"Genius is not replicable. Inspiration, though, is contagious, and multiform and even just to see, close up, power and aggression made vulnerable to beauty is to feel inspired and (in a fleeting, mortal way) reconciled."
--David Foster Wallace, () "Roger Federer as Religious Experience"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2012, 09:24 PM
SOXSINCE'70 SOXSINCE'70 is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: DEERFIELD
Posts: 5,027
Icon10

Both deserved this honor,but 22-6 is slighly tilted,IMO.

I'm just glad Posey's team beat Cabrera's in the World Series.

Gotta love a Giants WS Sweep!!
__________________
White Sox baseball - This is Next Year.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-15-2012, 11:19 PM
TDog TDog is offline
WSI Prelate
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Modesto, California
Posts: 16,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SOXSINCE'70 View Post
j... I'm just glad Posey's team beat Cabrera's in the World Series. ...
Last out of the World Series had both league MVPs at the plate, one in failure making the out offensively and the other in victory getting the putout defensively. I don't know if that has ever happened before, but I'm guessing it hasn't.

Because I think both selections were so obvious to me, I wouldn't have been surprised if both votes had been unanimous. I could see how some writers could have voted for Trout, but Posey wasn't simply an offensive force. He was the leader of a first-place team on defense and evn in the clubhouse.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2012, 11:35 PM
DSpivack DSpivack is offline
WSI Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Evanston
Posts: 29,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TDog View Post
Last out of the World Series had both league MVPs at the plate, one in failure making the out offensively and the other in victory getting the putout defensively. I don't know if that has ever happened before, but I'm guessing it hasn't.

Because I think both selections were so obvious to me, I wouldn't have been surprised if both votes had been unanimous. I could see how some writers could have voted for Trout, but Posey wasn't simply an offensive force. He was the leader of a first-place team on defense and evn in the clubhouse.
You have to go back to 1976 just to find a season in which both MVP winners were in the World Series.
__________________
Attendance records:
09 : 3-2.
10 : 2-3.
11: 0-1.
12: 2-1.
14: 2-3.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2012, 04:23 PM
pythons007 pythons007 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cedar Lake IN
Posts: 2,375
Default

Anyone listening to the Score or ESPN? I'm still at work and haven't heard a word. What's the commenting like?
__________________


YOUR 2005 WORLD CHAMPION CHICAGO WHITE SOX
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-17-2012, 02:23 PM
Oblong Oblong is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSpivack View Post
You have to go back to 1976 just to find a season in which both MVP winners were in the World Series.
1988, Gibson with the Dodgers and Canseco with the A's.

As soon as the announcements were made I went and looked it up. I would not have guessed that off the top of my head.
__________________
"You should enter a ballpark the way you enter a church." - Bill Lee
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-17-2012, 02:26 PM
DSpivack DSpivack is offline
WSI Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Evanston
Posts: 29,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblong View Post
1988, Gibson with the Dodgers and Canseco with the A's.

As soon as the announcements were made I went and looked it up. I would not have guessed that off the top of my head.
D'oh!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-15-2012, 09:29 PM
SOXSINCE'70 SOXSINCE'70 is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: DEERFIELD
Posts: 5,027
Agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagowhitesox1 View Post
I feel Trout was the real MVP for the AL though.
Many others feel that way,myself included.However,if Trout puts up similar numbers in '13,he will be a candidate again.I hope he wins the award by a land slide some day.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-15-2012, 10:36 PM
soxnut1018 soxnut1018 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,881
Default

Trout had the better season, but it's hard to be too upset with a Triple Crown winner being MVP.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-16-2012, 06:24 PM
SI1020 SI1020 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie
Posts: 4,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by soxnut1018 View Post
Trout had the better season, but it's hard to be too upset with a Triple Crown winner being MVP.
Did he? Because baseball-reference said his WAR is higher? Does anybody here know how to calculate WAR? I'm just asking, for all I know some of you do. Trout is a sensational young talent, and I probably appreciate defense more than most baseball fans, but like you said it's hard to kick about Cabrera winning the award this year.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-16-2012, 06:26 PM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 54,333
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SI1020 View Post
Did he? Because baseball-reference said his WAR is higher? Does anybody here know how to calculate WAR? I'm just asking, for all I know some of you do. Trout is a sensational young talent, and I probably appreciate defense more than most baseball fans, but like you said it's hard to kick about Cabrera winning the award this year.
Yes
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-16-2012, 06:36 PM
SI1020 SI1020 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie
Posts: 4,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doublem23 View Post
Yes
He could be a once in a generation type of player, and I sure as hell wish we had him. I love watching him play.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-16-2012, 07:32 PM
chicagowhitesox1 chicagowhitesox1 is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Aurora Illinois
Posts: 1,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SI1020 View Post
Did he? Because baseball-reference said his WAR is higher? Does anybody here know how to calculate WAR? I'm just asking, for all I know some of you do. Trout is a sensational young talent, and I probably appreciate defense more than most baseball fans, but like you said it's hard to kick about Cabrera winning the award this year.
I don't think WAR is perfect but in this case I feel it gives a good idea on who really had the better year. Trout had a 10.7 WAR while missing 3 weeks of the season which is historical and Cabrera had a 6.9 WAR which is good but can also be considered even below MVP standards in a saber type of view.

I don't have a problem with a triple crown winner winning the MVP but for Trout to only get 6 first place votes is a pretty old fashioned way of thinking by the writers. Most MLB teams if not all are using saber stats to evaluate players so it's probably time for the writers to start doing the same.

I don't buy into this logic of Cabrera won because he lead his team into the playoffs either. In the final 30 games of the season the Angels went 19-11 while the Tigers went 18-13. The main reason why the Tigers advanced is because the Whitesox stumbled and the Athletics won 8 of their last 9 games. Mike Trout energized a slumping team into a playoff contender and had he been called up earlier I think the Angels make the playoffs.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-16-2012, 07:58 PM
soxnut1018 soxnut1018 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,881
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SI1020 View Post
Did he? Because baseball-reference said his WAR is higher? Does anybody here know how to calculate WAR? I'm just asking, for all I know some of you do. Trout is a sensational young talent, and I probably appreciate defense more than most baseball fans, but like you said it's hard to kick about Cabrera winning the award this year.
You don't even need to use WAR. Just look at their offensive statistics (avg, obp, slg) and then factor in that Trout is far superior on defense and on the basepaths. This really isn't hard. Trout also played in a worse hitter's ballpark and in a tougher division. Trout was better in 2012, but I'm just happy we've finally evolved enough as a baseball world to where this is even debated.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.




Design by: Michelle

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site-specific editorial/photos Copyright ©2001 - 2008 White Sox Interactive. All rights reserved.