View Single Post
Old 12-11-2013, 03:04 PM
blandman blandman is offline
WSI Church Elder
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,482

Originally Posted by spawn View Post
Yep. The argument I don't get is thinking the Sox would get a better return for Santiago. He's a middle to back end rotation pitcher with one full season under his belt, and was swapped for a top prospect who could be the CFer for the Sox and a core piece for the foreseeable future. Add in he's cost controlled and fills a need, I don't see the issue here.
The problem is some people, incorrectly, view Santiago as a top rotation pitcher.
Reply With Quote