Originally Posted by TDog
The White Sox last year were a better team without Dunn in the lineup. That has been true since he came to the White Sox.
Which is basically like saying this bucket of **** tastes better than that bucket of ****, the bottom line is that it's all **** so what difference does it really make?
If you want to talk about the 2012 team falling short because of Dunn's poor play, I'm all ears, the Sox were at least average offensively, but if you're trying to lay the 2013 disaster at his feet, that's pretty silly.