View Single Post
  #351  
Old 08-10-2013, 05:38 PM
DSpivack DSpivack is online now
WSI Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Evanston
Posts: 28,877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JB98 View Post
It would be a huge mistake to sign Ellsbury. Huge mistake. I'm loathe to give a long-term deal to a player who is approaching 30 and makes a living with his speed. He'll be good for a couple more years, then his body will break down. The Sox shouldn't even consider him, and I don't think they will.
Agreed. De Aza has a career slash line of .279/.340/.417 and Ellsbury .297/.351/.440. Ellsbury gives you better defense and a lot more SBs, but is likely to command a lengthy contract of maybe $15 million/year, and you're paying for his declining years in his 30s. While De Aza is the same age, in his 2nd year of arbitration he'll probably get a little less than $3 million. I do not think signing Ellsbury would necessarily be prudent.
__________________
Attendance records:
09 : 3-2.
10 : 2-3.
11: 0-1.
12: 2-1.
14: 1-2.

Last edited by DSpivack; 08-10-2013 at 06:05 PM.
Reply With Quote