View Single Post
  #12  
Old 05-19-2013, 09:02 PM
kittle42 kittle42 is offline
WSI Prelate
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lakeview
Posts: 18,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TDog View Post
Actually, you can win without offense. You can also win without pitching. You generally lose when you don't have either. The Sox lost today because Peavy didn't pitch very well, and the offense couldn't overcome that. The Sox needed more from Peavy today because he obviously wasn't going to come out early to put more strain on the bullpen. Starters who walk in two runs with their team already losing by two generally don't stay in for two more innings. I am guessing that Ventura wanted a well-rested bullpen for Axelrod's start against the Red Sox

If Peavy was on, two runs would have been enough to win, even with a run in the ninth. The Sox beat the Angels scoring only two runs through eight and another in the ninth in Sale's start and scored nine runs in losing Santiago's start.
You blame pitching for 1-0, 2-1, 3-2 losses, consistently. Please, spread blame around where blame is due.
__________________
Ridiculousness across all sports:

(1) "You have no valid opinion because you never played the game."
(2) "Stats are irrelevant. This guy just doesn't know how to win."
Reply With Quote