Originally Posted by blandman
As a realist, I'm expecting a player with his approach to show regression.
You can't say "let's not start this argument again" and then say something that you know a lot of people vehemently disagree with.
Munch. You are not a realist in any sense of the word. You are a sensationalist at very best. You have a well displayed agenda against the White Sox and really want people to believe that literally everything will go wrong with them. You pushed your agenda to the point of making up quotes to support your "fact" that Danks would miss at least
one month, hours after you were proven wrong when you said he hadn't even thrown yet.
And no, even for the people who are not high on Viciedo, there is not "a lot" of people who vehemently disagree with the premise that he will have at least a slight improvement. Calling for a regression for a 23 year old after his first full big league season might be a new low for you.