Originally Posted by doublem23
Of course she's list is better for your argument; whenever you get to artificially select a smaller amount of names it almost always works out in your own favor. I've just showed you 5 years of the absolute best prospects in baseball. 20 names. 7 of them are busts. That's a 35% failure rate, AGAIN, of the very best prospects in baseball.
Hank Blalock made two all star teams. He is not a bust at all.
That's 5 busts out of 20.
And why did you stop at 2005 by the way?