View Single Post
  #45  
Old 09-07-2012, 01:44 PM
Jollyroger2 Jollyroger2 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doublem23 View Post
This is probably the 1st time in the history of baseball someone has tried to argue that a team's #1 starter is not super-critical to their success.
He's their marquee name pitcher but the other four starters have ERAs of 2.99, 2.98, 3.63 and 3.15, all four with 140-175 innings pitched so far. This isn't a situation like the Sox where they have Peavy and then Sale/Quintana who are tiring and then fill in the blank.

The conception that the Nationals are SS and a bunch of stiffs still seems to be what most in the media think. As if he's the only one responsible for them being now 33 games over .500.
Reply With Quote