PDA

View Full Version : VerlanderlayIndustries pitches no-no


CLR01
06-12-2007, 08:02 PM
Wouldn't it be sad if he lost it in the 9th? :D:

chisoxwschamps05
06-12-2007, 08:05 PM
Well when the Schilling thread started, it ended in the ninth so hopefully!

getonbckthr
06-12-2007, 08:06 PM
Go Verlander Go

JB98
06-12-2007, 08:09 PM
I hope the Brewers score five in the ninth.

Fenway
06-12-2007, 08:11 PM
NESN thanks you for alert FSN Detroit now in truck

CLR01
06-12-2007, 08:12 PM
NESN thanks you for alert FSN Detroit now in truck

My alerts aren't free. Break out the checkbook. :smile:

getonbckthr
06-12-2007, 08:12 PM
Guess i'm the only one that respects and appreciates history.

HotelWhiteSox
06-12-2007, 08:12 PM
ESPN showing it (MLB.com also for free)

The Racehorse
06-12-2007, 08:13 PM
Last Tiger to throw a no-no was Jack Morris back in '84 against our Sox.

HotelWhiteSox
06-12-2007, 08:13 PM
Someone bunt

getonbckthr
06-12-2007, 08:14 PM
1 more to go!

chisoxwschamps05
06-12-2007, 08:15 PM
Unfortunately, Verlander's stuff looks great and the Brewers look like they don't have a clue up at the plate.

getonbckthr
06-12-2007, 08:16 PM
Congrats Justin, Marks was better he had 1 walk:D:

HotelWhiteSox
06-12-2007, 08:16 PM
he got it

chisoxwschamps05
06-12-2007, 08:17 PM
Congrats to Verlander, but I guess Mark's gonna have to do it again.

CHISOXFAN13
06-12-2007, 08:17 PM
His stuff in the ninth was absolutely filthy.

getonbckthr
06-12-2007, 08:18 PM
His stuff in the ninth was absolutely filthy.
He passed 100 MPH twice in the 9th!!
And hello Mrs Verlander.

The Racehorse
06-12-2007, 08:18 PM
WTG for Verlander... but I wanted him to cough it up and the Brewers to some how win this game because our team needs all the help it can get.

Viva Medias B's
06-12-2007, 08:20 PM
Congrats to Verlander, but I would have preferred the Brewers to win for reasons I do not need to specify.

This is the first Tiger no-hitter since Jack Morris no-hit you-know-who back in 1984.

JB98
06-12-2007, 08:21 PM
His stuff in the ninth was absolutely filthy.

Graffanino missed strike three by a foot. Hardy got a pretty good pitch to hit, a breaking ball up. But he was behind in the count, took a defensive swing and flied out to Ordonez.

balke
06-12-2007, 08:24 PM
Nice pitching. Buehrle walked one, and picked him off to face the minimum. Verlander had 4 BB's. Advantage Buehrle, but not bad with the 12 K's for Verlander.

CLR01
06-12-2007, 08:24 PM
Congrats to Verlander, but I would have preferred the Brewers to win for reasons I do not need to specify.

This is the first Tiger no-hitter since Jack Morris no-hit you-know-who back in 1984.

The White Sox only won 74 games in 1984. :(:

BeviBall!
06-12-2007, 08:24 PM
Happy day for my fantasy team! A no-no and I traded away Dye.

Fungo
06-12-2007, 08:24 PM
Well....toss out the myth that pitchers are supposed to be fatigued from pitching in the previous years post season.:rolleyes:

CLR01
06-12-2007, 08:26 PM
LOL MY9 in NY showed the last out from NESN all thanks to WSI


$649.29

ilsox7
06-12-2007, 08:28 PM
$649.29

Per household . . .

CLR01
06-12-2007, 08:31 PM
Per household . . .

Way to be lookin' out. :cool:

HotelWhiteSox
06-12-2007, 08:31 PM
$649.29


/4000 members

sweet, 16 cents

chaerulez
06-12-2007, 08:34 PM
I always try to support a no hitter. I didn't want Schilling to get his, because I find him to be a dochue. But even though the Tigers are a division rival, I like seeing history made.

getonbckthr
06-12-2007, 08:35 PM
Congrats to Verlander, but I would have preferred the Brewers to win for reasons I do not need to specify.

This is the first Tiger no-hitter since Jack Morris no-hit you-know-who back in 1984.
In all honesty we are done.

The White Sox only won 74 games in 1984. :(:
Will we even win that many this season?

Viva Medias B's
06-12-2007, 08:39 PM
Not to start this old beef again, but ESPN is providing continuous BREAKING NEWS coverage of Verlander's no-hitter. Did ESPN do that for Buehrle's no-hitter? I cannot remember.

CLR01
06-12-2007, 08:40 PM
Not to start this old beef again, but ESPN is providing continuous BREAKING NEWS coverage of Verlander's no-hitter. Did ESPN do that for Buehrle's no-hitter? I cannot remember.

They didn't break into live coverage of the 9th but they spent a lot of time talking about it afterwards.

gjdodger
06-12-2007, 08:55 PM
ESPN was showing a two hour poker tournament. Pretty easy decision to break away from that.

soxfanatlanta
06-12-2007, 09:27 PM
Good for him.

Kogs35
06-12-2007, 09:35 PM
ESPN was showing a two hour poker tournament. Pretty easy decision to break away from that.

i think they had on nba that night, and espnews had live updates while talking to levineline on the phone

comerica
06-12-2007, 09:52 PM
nice work justin.

102605
06-12-2007, 09:54 PM
The White Sox only won 74 games in 1984. :(:


That sounds about right for 2007

UserNameBlank
06-12-2007, 10:17 PM
Good for him. Buehrle's was better though because he plays for the Sox.

PKalltheway
06-12-2007, 10:25 PM
Congratulations to Justin Verlander on his no-hitter:smile:

MRM
06-13-2007, 12:01 AM
Not to start this old beef again, but ESPN is providing continuous BREAKING NEWS coverage of Verlander's no-hitter. Did ESPN do that for Buehrle's no-hitter? I cannot remember.

Who cares? Does ESPN make or break your enjoyment of sports?

Congrats to Verlander. Awesome pitcher. Well deserved.

slobes
06-13-2007, 12:19 AM
His fastball clocked at 102 mph in the 9th inning. This is only his second year in the big leagues. Very, very impressive.

FireMariotti
06-13-2007, 01:37 AM
Wouldn't it be nice to see Verlander and Mark face off one time this season being the only two to pitch no hitters so far. It would make a good story at least.

Edit: Assuming Buehrle is still on the Sox if it happens. :(

Oblong
06-13-2007, 08:14 AM
I'm more concerned about Leyland leaving him out there for 112 pitches.

Fenway
06-13-2007, 08:24 AM
$649.29

I was thinking more along the lines of a :gulp:

Boondock Saint
06-13-2007, 09:13 AM
As much as I hate to say it, there's no better young pitcher out there. Verlander absolutely dominated out there.

jdm2662
06-13-2007, 09:14 AM
Congrats Jason on your no-hitter!

Fenway
06-13-2007, 09:18 AM
I always try to support a no hitter. I didn't want Schilling to get his, because I find him to be a dochue. But even though the Tigers are a division rival, I like seeing history made.

As much as I hate the New York Yankees I wanted Mike Mussina to pitch a perfect game in September 2001...( because I was there at Fenway )

and then HE screwed it up
http://images.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/_photos/2001-09-17-inside-everett.jpg

Mickster
06-13-2007, 09:19 AM
Congrats Jason on your no-hitter!

...and to Justin, too! :tongue:

ewokpelts
06-13-2007, 11:31 AM
Well when the Schilling thread started, it ended in the ninth so hopefully!but schilling is a pompus *******...verlander is actually a good pitcher and decent guy

jdm2662
06-13-2007, 11:35 AM
...and to Justin, too! :tongue:

Opps! Well, congrats Justin! :D:

jabrch
06-13-2007, 11:50 AM
Verlander is on the short list of players I'd want to take if I was starting an expansion franchise. While he is still one of the better pitchers in the game today, in 3 years we will be talking about him the same way we talk about guys like Santana.

I can envision Hawk gushing already...

chaerulez
06-13-2007, 01:08 PM
As much as I hate the New York Yankees I wanted Mike Mussina to pitch a perfect game in September 2001...( because I was there at Fenway )

and then HE screwed it up
http://images.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/_photos/2001-09-17-inside-everett.jpg

I think most baseball fans want to see history if they are there. Like when Mike Cameron hit 4 HRs at the Cell several years ago, but then the Sox didn't pitch to him and the Sox fans started booing.

jabrch
06-13-2007, 01:48 PM
His fastball clocked at 102 mph in the 9th inning. This is only his second year in the big leagues. Very, very impressive.

I'm questioning the radar gun in Detroit. Didn't they clock Zumaya at like 105 or something sick early this year? And now Verlander throwing 102 after 110 pitches?

I call bull****.

That said, Verlander was completely dominating, regardless of if he was throwing 95 or 102.

gjdodger
06-13-2007, 02:06 PM
but schilling is a pompus *******...verlander is actually a good pitcher and decent guy
A pompus dochue?

Jjav829
06-13-2007, 02:47 PM
As much as I hate to say it, there's no better young pitcher out there. Verlander absolutely dominated out there.

http://www.rotoworld.com/images/headshots/MLB/3412.jpg
"Define young."

FedEx227
06-13-2007, 03:01 PM
I'm questioning the radar gun in Detroit. Didn't they clock Zumaya at like 105 or something sick early this year? And now Verlander throwing 102 after 110 pitches?

I call bull****.

That said, Verlander was completely dominating, regardless of if he was throwing 95 or 102.

It's no doubt BS. I bet Verlander was still throwing heat 95-96ish, but there's no way he hits 102 in the 9th inning after 110 pitches.

Boondock Saint
06-13-2007, 03:06 PM
http://www.rotoworld.com/images/headshots/MLB/3412.jpg
"Define young."


Okay, that's a good call, but even then I'd say it's 1A and 1B type situation. I'd give a limb to start a team with either one of them.

jabrch
06-13-2007, 03:27 PM
http://www.rotoworld.com/images/headshots/MLB/3412.jpg
"Define young."


"Let me introduce myself....http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/mlb/players/20070502/7509.jpg


"Is there a party going on here? " http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/mlb/players/20070502/7487.jpg


"You boys playing cards?" http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/mlb/players/20070502/7504.jpg


"What about me?" http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/mlb/players/20070502/7484.jpg You aren't allowed

Other Mike
06-13-2007, 03:27 PM
He's thrown 100+ on the road this year frequently, and often late in games. The gun in Detroit may be off, but he commented on how amped up he was, so i doubt he was much under 100 if at all.

jabrch
06-13-2007, 03:49 PM
He's thrown 100+ on the road this year frequently, and often late in games. The gun in Detroit may be off, but he commented on how amped up he was, so i doubt he was much under 100 if at all.

I'll wait for someone who posts about something other than the Tigers to comment. Pardon me if I don't feel you are too objective.


There's no way he's throwing 102 after 110 pitches. That's just not reasonable.

And Zumaya is nowhere near 105.

comerica
06-13-2007, 09:52 PM
I can't recall Zumaya ever being clocked at 105. If he did, you're right, that's ridiculous. He's hit 102 in enough different ballparks that I'm willing to accept that, but anything higher and I'd have to agree that the gun is off.

Verlander hits 101 frequently enough that I don't doubt that he can do it. That said, I don't think he can do it in the 9th inning after pitching a full game. I'd guess that the pitch that registered 102 was around 99 or so. 99 is where he typically registers consistantly when he's really throwing heat, so I wouldn't doubt he could hit it with that much adrenaline pumping.