Mike Mussina anyone?

[Cuck_The_Fubs]

Considering the fact that Mussina is a FA in 2007, would anyone be opposed if he was traded to the white sox? Besides his age, it would be pretty sweet if he was on our team.:bandance:

[Ol' No. 2]

Considering the fact that Mussina is a FA in 2007, would anyone be opposed if he was traded to the white sox? Besides his age, it would be pretty sweet if he was on our team.:bandance:Sure. The Yankees have pitching to burn.:rolleyes:

[CashMan]

I could think of about 17mill reasons why not, I believe that is what he will make in the 2007 option year the yanks have on him.

[lumpyspun]

Watching that man pitch from the stretch is painful, with that god awful bend over slow thing he does. No thanks.

[FedEx227]

This is high risk medium reward... no thank you. At this point in the career, what does he give us besides maybe 2-3 decent seasons at BEST.

[Scottzilla]

last time i saw him pitch a few weeks ago he seemed like a total prick, it was on espn though so they thought it was so cute how he was showing up his teammates for not making plays

[Myrtle72]

Watching that man pitch from the stretch is painful, with that god awful bend over slow thing he does. No thanks.

Yep. That's a good reason not to have him on the Sox. :)

[Dan the Man]

He's not bad, but why trade for a guy who is 40ish and worth 17 mil a year when we have McCarthy who is young and cheap. Anyway, getting Mussina would just force B-Mac back to the pen, unless we trade two starters.

[Scottzilla]

He's not bad, but why trade for a guy who is 40ish and worth 17 mil a year when we have McCarthy who is young and cheap. Anyway, getting Mussina would just force Fingernails on a blackboard back to the pen, unless we trade two starters.

bmac = young mike mussina? YAY!!!

[SABRSox]

Where do we not sign?

[23Ventura]

He's old, he's not cheap. Is he really worth it? I don't think so.

[gbergman]

no!!!!!!!!!!

[Rockman218]

Hes too old, and he isn't Roger Clemens

[jongarlandlover]

er. i think i'll pass.

[spiffie]

I say no, but not because of age or talent, but purely salary. If the Yanks didn't exercise the option and we could get him at 10mm/2 or 3 years I'd say sure. His line this year was better than any of our 5 starters. If we were to then use two starters (Garcia/Vazquez/Contreras group) to shore up SS and LF I'd be happy with that move.

[HotelWhiteSox]

http://www.whitesoxinteractive.com/vbulletin/images/icons/disagree.gif

[A. Cavatica]

Hmmm...let's see who on our current roster I would rather entrust with a starting job than Mussina.

1. Contreras
2. Buehrle
3. Garland
4. McCarthy
5. Vazquez
6. Garcia

$17M for a #7 starter? Where do I sign?

[Britt Burns]

Um, no.

[shoelessshaun27!]

Yes, we need some new pitchers.

[Sox-o-matic]

I never want the Sox to miss a postseason again.

One ****ty year and people want to drop Podsednik, Uribe, Anderson, and Garcia/Vazquez for the likes of Dave Roberts, Julio Lugo, Juan Pierre, and Mike Mussina.

Ugh.

I'd rather see KW do nothing than screw this team over for the next 2-3 years.

[Iwritecode]

I would've taken him back when NY signed him...

[AuroraSoxFan]

I was going to ask what he'd cost. Soon as I saw someone say he has a $17 mill option, that was it for me. Unless we'll get someone of Johan Santana cakiber, that is too much $$ to shell out.

[IlliniSox]

Considering the fact that Mussina is a FA in 2007, would anyone be opposed if he was traded to the white sox? Besides his age, it would be pretty sweet if he was on our team.:bandance:

:welcome: first of all.

Second, easy on all the speculative threads with nothing more than your hunch as the basis. Establish yourself here.

Welcome again.

[esbrechtel]

No

[ajismyhero]

But he's really great at crossword puzzles!!