chaerulez
10-06-2006, 11:41 PM
Just now I see on BBTN, talking about I-Roid's slide into third, close call and it goes the Tigers way. Ravech says, "Usually close calls go to the Yankees!"
They do?
I'm sure ESPN has messed up your brain to think that everything should be geared towards the Yankees, or you might just be an idiot. Yes, the Yankees have gotten calls. Jeffery Maier comes to mind. But I think the umpires got A-Rod's slap of Arroyo in the 2004 ALCS correctly. Kenny Rogers seemed to get a few close strikes in tonights game. I thought close calls should be going to the Yankees? Tell me Karl, with a $200 million payroll and getting the benefit of the doubt in most close calls, how =have the Yankees not won a World Series since 2000?
MLB should be furious a comment like that was made. That implies that MLB and the umpires go out of their way to favor the Yankees. And that basically says the league is fixed. And I thought Ravech was a clown when he said that Santana was part of the blame of the Game 1 loss despite giving up 2 runs in 7 innings...
They do?
I'm sure ESPN has messed up your brain to think that everything should be geared towards the Yankees, or you might just be an idiot. Yes, the Yankees have gotten calls. Jeffery Maier comes to mind. But I think the umpires got A-Rod's slap of Arroyo in the 2004 ALCS correctly. Kenny Rogers seemed to get a few close strikes in tonights game. I thought close calls should be going to the Yankees? Tell me Karl, with a $200 million payroll and getting the benefit of the doubt in most close calls, how =have the Yankees not won a World Series since 2000?
MLB should be furious a comment like that was made. That implies that MLB and the umpires go out of their way to favor the Yankees. And that basically says the league is fixed. And I thought Ravech was a clown when he said that Santana was part of the blame of the Game 1 loss despite giving up 2 runs in 7 innings...