PDA

View Full Version : Prior no hitter going....


downstairs
07-26-2006, 12:47 PM
Prior has a no hitter in the 6th.

http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/gamecenter/live/MLB_20060726_CHC@NYM

But its 0-0.

I sense another classic meltdown coming...

getonbckthr
07-26-2006, 12:48 PM
I hope he gets it, we haven't had 1 in a long time.

nysox35
07-26-2006, 12:48 PM
Prior has a no hitter in the 6th.

http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/gamecenter/live/MLB_20060726_CHC@NYM

But its 0-0.

I sense another classic meltdown coming...
85 pitches through 5...4 BB. Don't worry, Dusty will let him go up to 150 to get the no hitter.

QCIASOXFAN
07-26-2006, 12:49 PM
Way to jinx it.:smile:

downstairs
07-26-2006, 12:49 PM
I hope he gets it, we haven't had 1 in a long time.

If I am not mistaken, it would be the first on in Shea?

(Or am I wrong? I know the Mets have never had one. Not sure if they've ever been no-hit either)

downstairs
07-26-2006, 12:50 PM
Way to jinx it.:smile:

I'm tryin'

In all seriousness, I don't care... but similar to Zambrano's perfect game bid being broken up... these things usually lead to comedy gold.

UofCSoxFan
07-26-2006, 12:54 PM
see i'm torn..i hate the cubs and have many obnoxious cub fan friends so I usually root against them...but I also have a couple obnoxious met fan friends that would go nuts if swept by the cubs....hmm.

Ideal situation...prior no hitter through 9 but score is 0-0...prior gives up hit in the tenth but wins 1-0...prior thows out arm and never pitches again.

patbooyah
07-26-2006, 12:57 PM
i hope he gets a no-hitter. he is a great pitcher who happens to be injury ridden. I don't hold that against him. above the sox, i'm a baseball fan and this is very exciting.

unfortunately, his pitch count is about 2000 in the sixth, and he's not helping himself by throwing three balls to every hitter.

kraut83
07-26-2006, 12:58 PM
Obviously I'm wrong, but wasn't he supposed to be headed back to the DL last week?

jenn2080
07-26-2006, 01:00 PM
Obviously I'm wrong, but wasn't he supposed to be headed back to the DL last week?

yup sure was

TheDarkGundam
07-26-2006, 01:00 PM
Dusty pulls Prior out.

TheOldRoman
07-26-2006, 01:00 PM
Prior pulled:
5 2/3
0 hits
4 BB

and he looks to be injured again.:rolleyes:

Jjav829
07-26-2006, 01:00 PM
Prior is done. That's a shame. He had to leave in the 6th with a no-hitter going. It's also possible that he had something wrong with his hand.

jenn2080
07-26-2006, 01:02 PM
Prior pulled:
5 2/3
0 hits
4 BB

and he looks to be injured again.:rolleyes:

so much for the no hitter.

soxfan13
07-26-2006, 01:04 PM
so much for the no hitter.

Would still get credit for a shared no-hitter if they finish it off

jdm2662
07-26-2006, 01:05 PM
He threw 103 pitches and he's been injured all year. You can't let him go on.

downstairs
07-26-2006, 01:07 PM
Would still get credit for a shared no-hitter if they finish it off

Sort of. There have been many combined no-hitters, so I guess he'd get "credit" for being part of one.

Madvora
07-26-2006, 01:22 PM
Valentin with a single in the bottom of the 7th

voodoochile
07-26-2006, 01:24 PM
Sort of. There have been many combined no-hitters, so I guess he'd get "credit" for being part of one.

Yes, but I am pretty sure they don't list them in the official record books anymore.

ChiSox80
07-26-2006, 01:31 PM
Yay Valenstache!

:bandance:

PennStater98r
07-26-2006, 02:21 PM
Flirting with a no-no just in time for the trade deadline...

PKalltheway
07-27-2006, 12:48 AM
Yes, but I am pretty sure they don't list them in the official record books anymore.
I've seen the Astros' six-pitcher no-hitter from 2003 in the record books as well as many, many others. Also, on another note, I have just seen the play that the no-hitter was lost on. Pathetic. Simply pathetic. Just when you think that team could not get any worse...

voodoochile
07-27-2006, 05:49 AM
I've seen the Astros' six-pitcher no-hitter from 2003 in the record books as well as many, many others. Also, on another note, I have just seen the play that the no-hitter was lost on. Pathetic. Simply pathetic. Just when you think that team could not get any worse...

Okay, is that the official record book of MLB or just a book of stats? Just curious, because I swear I remember them saying they were removing the group nonos from the official record books along with the ones where the pitcher lost the game due to walks or errors and the rain shortened ones.

fquaye149
07-27-2006, 09:17 AM
Yes, but I am pretty sure they don't list them in the official record books anymore.

alejandro pena and mark wohlers are outraged!

MadetoOrta
07-27-2006, 12:29 PM
I seem to recall "BLue Moon" Odom and someone else throwing a combined no-hitter for the Sox against the A's in the '70's. The other name escapes me. Anyone remember?

Dick Allen
07-27-2006, 12:41 PM
I seem to recall "BLue Moon" Odom and someone else throwing a combined no-hitter for the Sox against the A's in the '70's. The other name escapes me. Anyone remember?I think it was Francisco Barrios, not 100% sure.

PKalltheway
07-27-2006, 03:03 PM
Okay, is that the official record book of MLB or just a book of stats? Just curious, because I swear I remember them saying they were removing the group nonos from the official record books along with the ones where the pitcher lost the game due to walks or errors and the rain shortened ones.
You may be right, I got the info out of the Sports Illustrated Almanac, not the official MLB record book. They may have actually already removed it.

eriqjaffe
07-27-2006, 03:40 PM
I think it was Francisco Barrios, not 100% sure.Yeah, it was Barrios. Odom walked 9 in 5 innings and was hit with an unearned run in the Sox 2-1 victory.

20 years ago...tomorrow!

http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/B07280OAK1976.htm

Wsoxmike59
07-29-2006, 07:34 AM
If I am not mistaken, it would be the first on in Shea?

(Or am I wrong? I know the Mets have never had one. Not sure if they've ever been no-hit either)

The Phillies Jim Bunning threw a perfect game vs the Mets on Father's Day 1964. I believe that is the only no hitter ever thrown at Shea Stadium.

Wsoxmike59
07-29-2006, 07:36 AM
Okay, is that the official record book of MLB or just a book of stats? Just curious, because I swear I remember them saying they were removing the group nonos from the official record books along with the ones where the pitcher lost the game due to walks or errors and the rain shortened ones.

From Wikipedia:
After an unprecedented nine no-hitters in 1990, and on the way to eight in 1991, including one in regulation broken up in extra innings, one ended early because of weather, and one where the losing pitcher gave up no hits, but errors caused the team to lose, and the home side did not have to bat, Major League Baseball changed the rules so that only no-hit games of nine or more full innings ending with no hits are officially recognized. No-hitters and perfect games that go into extra innings because the score is tied at the end of regulation play (including 0-0 ties) are only recognized if the game finishes without it being broken up. Rain-shortened "official game" no-hitters are also no longer recognized (though they always had an "asterisk (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterisk)" in the record books). As a result, Ken Johnson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Johnson)'s 9-inning no-hit loss is the only one that is still recognized in the official baseball record books; the other cases noted above are simply "footnotes" in baseball trivia books and websites (including the Elias Sports Bureau). This ruling, which has caused some no-hitters up to 100 years old to be "reversed", has been quite controversial, especially in the case of the two perfect games that were ended in extra innings and technically fit the "9 inning" definition. The 1917 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1917) "double no-hitter" by both sides is not officially recognized anymore either; only Fred Toney (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Toney)'s 10-inning feat is officially considered a no-hitter.