Hangar18
05-30-2006, 09:47 AM
Jay Idiotti today admits that hes tired of writing week after week about how the Trib should sell the Cubs. Immediately, I thought WOW, does that mean hes going to write about the the Team that Just won the WORLD SERIES and has one of the TOP records in Baseball right now? No, Idiotti, like the other lazy media, instead chooses to cross the line of Journalist and Propogandist and tries to help Cub fans and tamper with Mark Cuban. Ive never heard a potential owners name Comes up as much as ive heard Cubans in just one month. Only a month. The Media here says the
Sox winning in May was "too early" and "Lets see what happens when they play the AL East" and "Lets see at the break". After continueing to be hot and in 1st, they Waffled and said the Cubs losing is a big story.
Huh?
This year, the Cubs started out REDHOT, starting 5-2 (only 7 games mind you) the Media went HOG WILD saying the Cubs were on their way, things are different, they deserve all the coverage, Cubs in 1st is a big big story. Well, karma caught up with them, and we know what happened losing 20 of 25. Well now guess what? The Cubs, per history and usual, have bumbled and stumbled their way thru May and now the Cubs losing is a big big story.
Huh?
Jay Idiotti decides hes going to find a new owner for the Cubs instead of writing about how the SOX bullpen could use help (why isnt he finding us another pitcher?) How Lazy is he?
CBS couldnt wait to report the Cubs winning on their nitely newscast last nite. They showed Vince & Jennifer a million times, and quietly downplayed the "near riot" when they appeared afterwards at the MusicBox (a couple blks west of the Urinal). Cameras there showed an unruly and pushy crowd ............when lo and behold, one can make out Cub hats and Wrigley Tshirts among the rioters. that explained everything, drunks made thier way west to the movie theatre. Lazy Media wont report that however.
Sox were DOMINATED in media coverage over the weekend, in print and radio. The SOX were only audible/visible because of commercials. Despicable the way the media lazily lies in bed with that other team. The Tribune on Sunday, did a lead story, on how AJ PIERZYNSKI is one of the most hated in baseball. It had a giant full-color caricature of him, with Tomatoes pelted on him (hinting Cub fans to do this when the teams meet again in July). The story then talks about the most hated guys in sports, including such dirtbags like Bill Romanowski, who would bite and spit on people, punch his own teammates, and Bill Laimbeer, a guy who defined playing DIRTY. The story then goes to Claude Lemieux, a guy in the NHL who was very very very much hated for being a goon, fighting and playing about as dirty as anyone in any sport. That was it. They mentioned a couple of other "dirty" players, but that was it. After reading this GARBAGE, I thought, why the hell did they title it the way they did?
Why was AJ on the cover? With Tomatoes in his picture (so cub fans can throw things at him in July) What a garbage story and a waste of my time
OH, but in the Tribunes magazine on Sunday, who is on the Cover but Maddux, lauding him for starting out 5-0 and being old (obviously was written a few weeks ago, hes since fizzled also).
What a disgusting and repulsive weekend this was media-wise in Chicago.
Despite Winning the World Series in 2005, and being only the 5th team in history to lead from wire-to-wire, the SOX find themselves INEXPLICABLY lagging far far far behind to a team that, since 1950, has only THREE 90-win seasons, finished in 4th place last season, is in 5th place currently, and has won NOTHING of significance since the Roosevelt administration to warrant getting as much Time, Love and Attention from the Chicago Media.
Chicago Tribune:
8 cub stories (Plus 1 giant Magazine story)
3 sox stories
Chicago SunTimes:
7 cub stories
3 sox stories
Standings Tuesday May 30th, 2006
Priviledged, Media Owned, Media Favored, 4th place in 2005 Cubs497
Underdog, Media Maligned, Media Ignored, WS CHamps in 05 SOX 408
Sox winning in May was "too early" and "Lets see what happens when they play the AL East" and "Lets see at the break". After continueing to be hot and in 1st, they Waffled and said the Cubs losing is a big story.
Huh?
This year, the Cubs started out REDHOT, starting 5-2 (only 7 games mind you) the Media went HOG WILD saying the Cubs were on their way, things are different, they deserve all the coverage, Cubs in 1st is a big big story. Well, karma caught up with them, and we know what happened losing 20 of 25. Well now guess what? The Cubs, per history and usual, have bumbled and stumbled their way thru May and now the Cubs losing is a big big story.
Huh?
Jay Idiotti decides hes going to find a new owner for the Cubs instead of writing about how the SOX bullpen could use help (why isnt he finding us another pitcher?) How Lazy is he?
CBS couldnt wait to report the Cubs winning on their nitely newscast last nite. They showed Vince & Jennifer a million times, and quietly downplayed the "near riot" when they appeared afterwards at the MusicBox (a couple blks west of the Urinal). Cameras there showed an unruly and pushy crowd ............when lo and behold, one can make out Cub hats and Wrigley Tshirts among the rioters. that explained everything, drunks made thier way west to the movie theatre. Lazy Media wont report that however.
Sox were DOMINATED in media coverage over the weekend, in print and radio. The SOX were only audible/visible because of commercials. Despicable the way the media lazily lies in bed with that other team. The Tribune on Sunday, did a lead story, on how AJ PIERZYNSKI is one of the most hated in baseball. It had a giant full-color caricature of him, with Tomatoes pelted on him (hinting Cub fans to do this when the teams meet again in July). The story then talks about the most hated guys in sports, including such dirtbags like Bill Romanowski, who would bite and spit on people, punch his own teammates, and Bill Laimbeer, a guy who defined playing DIRTY. The story then goes to Claude Lemieux, a guy in the NHL who was very very very much hated for being a goon, fighting and playing about as dirty as anyone in any sport. That was it. They mentioned a couple of other "dirty" players, but that was it. After reading this GARBAGE, I thought, why the hell did they title it the way they did?
Why was AJ on the cover? With Tomatoes in his picture (so cub fans can throw things at him in July) What a garbage story and a waste of my time
OH, but in the Tribunes magazine on Sunday, who is on the Cover but Maddux, lauding him for starting out 5-0 and being old (obviously was written a few weeks ago, hes since fizzled also).
What a disgusting and repulsive weekend this was media-wise in Chicago.
Despite Winning the World Series in 2005, and being only the 5th team in history to lead from wire-to-wire, the SOX find themselves INEXPLICABLY lagging far far far behind to a team that, since 1950, has only THREE 90-win seasons, finished in 4th place last season, is in 5th place currently, and has won NOTHING of significance since the Roosevelt administration to warrant getting as much Time, Love and Attention from the Chicago Media.
Chicago Tribune:
8 cub stories (Plus 1 giant Magazine story)
3 sox stories
Chicago SunTimes:
7 cub stories
3 sox stories
Standings Tuesday May 30th, 2006
Priviledged, Media Owned, Media Favored, 4th place in 2005 Cubs497
Underdog, Media Maligned, Media Ignored, WS CHamps in 05 SOX 408