Tekijawa
03-10-2006, 03:01 PM
I know this morning that Gammons had mentioned on Mike and Mike that Baseball might be able to suspend bonds for his Steroid use. In all the articles I've read on the subject the wording in the Policy is "Positive test". Now with all the new evidence I think it is now publicly common knowledge that Bonds has used, but since he never had a "positive test" can it be argued that he can't be suspended, maybe not rightfully so, but I would imagine that the types of lawyers that bonds could afford could make a good case for such.
Side note: Is Bonds part of the players association? For some reason I don't think he is. Technically, there too, it could be argued that he never made an agreement with MLB on their Policy... There are a lot of loopholes that I'm sure will be used to get him on the field, it's just a matter o how much he can take from the fans and the Media?!!??
Side note: Is Bonds part of the players association? For some reason I don't think he is. Technically, there too, it could be argued that he never made an agreement with MLB on their Policy... There are a lot of loopholes that I'm sure will be used to get him on the field, it's just a matter o how much he can take from the fans and the Media?!!??