elrod
10-20-2005, 12:24 AM
Both the White Sox and Astros have done things right in the post-season to get to the World Series. Both teams defeated the reigning pennant winner in their respective leagues, and both teams advanced without facing an elimination game. We know about the regular season stats comparing the two teams:
ERA
Astros: 3.51 (3.46 starters and 3.63 relievers)
White Sox: 3.61 (3.75 starters and 3.23 relievers)
Considering the DH, our 3.61 is actually quite a bit better than their 3.51.
OPS
Astros: .730
White Sox: .747
Neither are very impressive, but their lineup gets a slight edge because they have a pitcher batting. Overall, the teams match up pretty evenly in the regular season.
But what about the post-season? One should be careful judging statistics on 8 or 9 games, but it does give you a sense of who's hot and who's struggling. And here some interesting differences emerge.
ERA
Astros: 3.43
White Sox: 2.50
Given the DH, those numbers are even more impressive for the Sox. Quite simply, the White Sox pitchers this post-season have been MUCH stronger than the Astros. 3 of the 4 starters on the Sox have ERAs under 3. Only Oswalt has an ERA under 3 for the Astros.
OPS
Astros: .730
White Sox: .806
With the DH difference, these two numbers are fairly equal. But if you look at OPS with runners in scoring position, the difference is staggering.
OPS W/RISP
Astros: .738 (74 ABs)
White Sox: 1.081 (67 ABs)
CONCLUSION:
Though the regular season numbers are quite even, our post-season numbers in pitching and hitting are much stronger, especially in clutch situations. Clemens and Pettitte have been fairly mediocre in the post-season; Clemens has a 4.50 ERA and Pettitte has a 4.66 ERA. Only Oswalt has a 1.69 ERA after tonight. It's hard to compare bullpen numbers because White Sox relievers have only thrown 8 innings, and have a 0.00 ERA (compared with a 2.43 for Houston in 33.1 innings). Among Sox starters, Garland is 2.00, Buehrle is 2.81, Contreras is 2.88, and Garcia is 3.21. And that includes games against the Red Sox, the best hitting team in baseball (and healthy too, unlike St. Louis). As for hitters, the only really tough outs for Houston have been Berkman (1.119 OPS), Burke (1.271 OPS) and Lamb (.924 OPS); nobody else is higher than .800. On the Sox, AJ is at 1.000 OPS, Konerko at .961, Podsednik at .959, Crede at .871 and Uribe at .857. Our biggest hole has been Everett (.561), and their worst is the other Everett (.631). Overall, I'd take our starters and our hitters against theirs based on their recent performance. As for the bullpen? Who knows, but it's hard to beat a 0.00 ERA.
ERA
Astros: 3.51 (3.46 starters and 3.63 relievers)
White Sox: 3.61 (3.75 starters and 3.23 relievers)
Considering the DH, our 3.61 is actually quite a bit better than their 3.51.
OPS
Astros: .730
White Sox: .747
Neither are very impressive, but their lineup gets a slight edge because they have a pitcher batting. Overall, the teams match up pretty evenly in the regular season.
But what about the post-season? One should be careful judging statistics on 8 or 9 games, but it does give you a sense of who's hot and who's struggling. And here some interesting differences emerge.
ERA
Astros: 3.43
White Sox: 2.50
Given the DH, those numbers are even more impressive for the Sox. Quite simply, the White Sox pitchers this post-season have been MUCH stronger than the Astros. 3 of the 4 starters on the Sox have ERAs under 3. Only Oswalt has an ERA under 3 for the Astros.
OPS
Astros: .730
White Sox: .806
With the DH difference, these two numbers are fairly equal. But if you look at OPS with runners in scoring position, the difference is staggering.
OPS W/RISP
Astros: .738 (74 ABs)
White Sox: 1.081 (67 ABs)
CONCLUSION:
Though the regular season numbers are quite even, our post-season numbers in pitching and hitting are much stronger, especially in clutch situations. Clemens and Pettitte have been fairly mediocre in the post-season; Clemens has a 4.50 ERA and Pettitte has a 4.66 ERA. Only Oswalt has a 1.69 ERA after tonight. It's hard to compare bullpen numbers because White Sox relievers have only thrown 8 innings, and have a 0.00 ERA (compared with a 2.43 for Houston in 33.1 innings). Among Sox starters, Garland is 2.00, Buehrle is 2.81, Contreras is 2.88, and Garcia is 3.21. And that includes games against the Red Sox, the best hitting team in baseball (and healthy too, unlike St. Louis). As for hitters, the only really tough outs for Houston have been Berkman (1.119 OPS), Burke (1.271 OPS) and Lamb (.924 OPS); nobody else is higher than .800. On the Sox, AJ is at 1.000 OPS, Konerko at .961, Podsednik at .959, Crede at .871 and Uribe at .857. Our biggest hole has been Everett (.561), and their worst is the other Everett (.631). Overall, I'd take our starters and our hitters against theirs based on their recent performance. As for the bullpen? Who knows, but it's hard to beat a 0.00 ERA.