A. Cavatica
05-04-2005, 11:06 PM
There's a statistic called 'game score' that attempts to reduce each start to a single number. It's crude but it's fun. It gives credit for innings pitched & strikeouts, deducts for hits & walks & earned runs, and is weighted so a typical "quality start" comes in around 50.
For example, Garcia's outing tonight (6.1 8 2 2 2 4) scored 51.
A score around 40 still gives you a decent chance to win. For example, Garcia's start against Seattle (7 9 5 5 2 2) scored 39.
Anyway, according to game scores, our starters are simply amazing. Each starters is averaging better than 50, and each starter has been consistent. We've had only two bad starts so far (Buehrle 6 11 7 7 3 2 and Hernandez 5 8 6 4 4 1), and we were in both those games. And good starts (> 60)? We've had 12 of those.
Garland: 41, 66, 70, 81, 84 (average: 68)
Garcia: 57, 72, 39, 64, 67, 51 (average: 58)
Buehrle: 82, 42, 88, 56, 21, 54 (average: 57)
Contreras: 62, 46, 40, 59, 65 (average: 54)
Hernandez: 66, 28, 54, 52, 53 (average: 51)
For example, Garcia's outing tonight (6.1 8 2 2 2 4) scored 51.
A score around 40 still gives you a decent chance to win. For example, Garcia's start against Seattle (7 9 5 5 2 2) scored 39.
Anyway, according to game scores, our starters are simply amazing. Each starters is averaging better than 50, and each starter has been consistent. We've had only two bad starts so far (Buehrle 6 11 7 7 3 2 and Hernandez 5 8 6 4 4 1), and we were in both those games. And good starts (> 60)? We've had 12 of those.
Garland: 41, 66, 70, 81, 84 (average: 68)
Garcia: 57, 72, 39, 64, 67, 51 (average: 58)
Buehrle: 82, 42, 88, 56, 21, 54 (average: 57)
Contreras: 62, 46, 40, 59, 65 (average: 54)
Hernandez: 66, 28, 54, 52, 53 (average: 51)