View Full Version : no no decision

04-25-2005, 10:40 PM
Which Sox 2005 starter is the most liable to throw a no hitter?

mike squires
04-25-2005, 11:26 PM
It would have to be Bheurlie mon...I think on the perfect night like a few starts ago John would have a good shot when he's got all his pitches working...

04-26-2005, 12:09 AM
Buehrle because he's actually gotten pretty darn close to it a few times.

04-26-2005, 12:29 AM
With the way Garland pitched tonight, I'd say he's in the running now.

04-26-2005, 12:32 AM
This year? Garland. He's been unstoppable and when batters do get the bat on the ball, he saws them off and they're left with the bat handle in their hand running to first base.

He almost had a no hitter last year agains the Expos last year as well.

First pitch strikes, and sinking fastballs.

04-26-2005, 02:40 AM
Wasn't it a bet between Buehrle and Garland to see who could get a no-hitter first, and didn't Garland breathe a sigh of relief when Buehrle's no-hitter was broken by Vizquel in Cleveland last July?

Because of this friendly competition, it could be either pitcher. But, if I were to choose one, I'd have to say Buehrle. He'd lull his competition to sleep in under an hour and a half. :D:

04-26-2005, 02:48 AM
This is a good question, but I would have to bet on Buerhle. However, I really think Contreras has the stuff to do it, but he has to have good control, so it's unlikely.