PDA

View Full Version : 18 innings


MRKARNO
05-28-2004, 03:05 PM
That's how long its been since we've been scored upon. In that time, we have thrown out two runners at home plate as well. How long will this last?

CyYoung5621
05-28-2004, 03:10 PM
Hopefully for another 18!

soltrain21
05-28-2004, 03:23 PM
I think we are turning the corner as a team. Sure we won't keep up the scoreless innings stuff, but I really think we are starting to gel...

HomeFish
05-28-2004, 03:24 PM
I don't see it getting past 20 with the Angels. Heck, with Garland on the mound, it might not reach 19.

MRKARNO
05-28-2004, 03:27 PM
Originally posted by HomeFish
I don't see it getting past 20 with the Angels. Heck, with Garland on the mound, it might not reach 19.

I dont know what Garland you're watching. Yes he did have a bad start last time around, but he got 17 runs of support and before that he had a 3.69 ERA. He's been a ton better this year. The movement on his pitches looks awesome and he knows how to pitch better.

doublem23
05-28-2004, 03:29 PM
Originally posted by MRKARNO
I dont know what Garland you're watching. Yes he did have a bad start last time around, but he got 17 runs of support and before that he had a 3.69 ERA. He's been a ton better this year. The movement on his pitches looks awesome and he knows how to pitch better.

Sigh, I don't even bother worrying about it anymore. At least with Lip, his doom and gloom ebbs and flows with how the Sox are doing. With HF, it's just annoying.

CHISOXFAN13
05-28-2004, 03:32 PM
Originally posted by HomeFish
I don't see it getting past 20 with the Angels. Heck, with Garland on the mound, it might not reach 19.

That same Angels lineup that produced a whopping zero victories in Toronto this week.

I can't believe I just wasted a minute of my life responding to this thread.

HomeFish
05-28-2004, 03:34 PM
Originally posted by CHISOXFAN13
That same Angels lineup that produced a whopping zero victories in Toronto this week.


Remember what the Sox did first game after getting swept by Toronto? It's not necessarily a good indicator of abilities. They still have a very potent team.

soltrain21
05-28-2004, 03:37 PM
Originally posted by CHISOXFAN13
That same Angels lineup that produced a whopping zero victories in Toronto this week.

I can't believe I just wasted a minute of my life responding to this thread.


I can, nerd!

SEALgep
05-28-2004, 03:39 PM
Originally posted by HomeFish
I don't see it getting past 20 with the Angels. Heck, with Garland on the mound, it might not reach 19. Just admit once and for all that you're not a Sox fan.

CHISOXFAN13
05-28-2004, 03:39 PM
Originally posted by soltrain21
I can, nerd!

UM, OK. That seemed neccessary.

SoxxoS
05-28-2004, 04:13 PM
Originally posted by HomeFish
I don't see it getting past 20 with the Angels. Heck, with Garland on the mound, it might not reach 19.

With your moronic pessimism, you are quickly turning into the worst poster on this whole board. Congratulations.

HomeFish
05-28-2004, 07:08 PM
...and it doesn't reach 19 against the Angels.

SEALgep
05-28-2004, 07:27 PM
Originally posted by HomeFish
...and it doesn't reach 19 against the Angels. When you are as pessimistic as you are, you're bound to be right sometimes. Good job Mr. Sox fan.

voodoochile
05-28-2004, 07:33 PM
Originally posted by SEALgep
When you are as pessimistic as you are, you're bound to be right sometimes. Good job Mr. Sox fan.

Just ignore him, everyone else does...

FarWestChicago
05-28-2004, 07:53 PM
Originally posted by voodoochile
Just ignore him, everyone else does... I wonder if he's Ken Blanks. :o:

Daver
05-28-2004, 08:09 PM
Originally posted by FarWestChicago
I wonder if he's Ken Blanks. :o:

He doesn't have enough fire to be Ken Blanks.