MRKARNO
03-19-2004, 09:46 PM
That was a challenge for the White Sox in 2003, and for all the things that went wrong, at least management didn't do anything stupid with Paul Konerko or Joe Crede. Both got off to horrendous starts, but the Sox stuck with them -- granted, there weren't any viable replacements aboard -- and both hit in the second half of the season like we all knew they could.
Here are the OPS's for Konerko and Crede, before and after the 2003 All-Star Game:
Before After
Konerko 567 853
Crede 625 892
(Remember, OPS is on-base percentage plus slugging percentage, so you can probably guess that 567 and 625 aren't real good). What happens before the All-Star break does count, and when predicting the future we can't just assume that those three months don't mean anything. But if Konerko and Crede both hit like they can for a whole season, the White Sox have a good chance to score more runs than anybody else in the division (preventing them is a whole 'nother thing).
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/spring2004/columns/story?columnist=neyer_rob&id=1763415
Here are the OPS's for Konerko and Crede, before and after the 2003 All-Star Game:
Before After
Konerko 567 853
Crede 625 892
(Remember, OPS is on-base percentage plus slugging percentage, so you can probably guess that 567 and 625 aren't real good). What happens before the All-Star break does count, and when predicting the future we can't just assume that those three months don't mean anything. But if Konerko and Crede both hit like they can for a whole season, the White Sox have a good chance to score more runs than anybody else in the division (preventing them is a whole 'nother thing).
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/spring2004/columns/story?columnist=neyer_rob&id=1763415