PDA

View Full Version : The latest in ESPN offeseason activity rankings


munchman33
01-04-2004, 04:21 PM
We've moved down to 26. Ugh. At least the Twins are still lower.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1692140

CWsox45
01-04-2004, 04:44 PM
That report is B.S., how could we be ranked at 26 with fine acquisitions like Juan Uribe and Santiago?

CWSOX45

duke of dorwood
01-04-2004, 04:52 PM
You forget the managing experience we've added too

ChiWhiteSox1337
01-04-2004, 05:59 PM
I don't like how they say the Tigers are the most improved team in the central, but this was before the royals got jaun gone.

doublem23
01-04-2004, 06:36 PM
The Tigers probably are the most improved team but that's because its so easy.

CubKilla
01-05-2004, 01:15 AM
Originally posted by doublem23
The Tigers probably are the most improved team but that's because its so easy.

I'd still have given the edge to KC even before the Gonzalez signing. Santiago, Leskanic, Graffenino, and the few others KC signed are, IMO, better signings than Vina, White, and the few others Detroit signed.

CubKilla
01-05-2004, 01:17 AM
Originally posted by munchman33
We've moved down to 26. Ugh. At least the Twins are still lower.

Have the Twins added anyone besides Guerrier? They're as pathetic as the White Sox.

RKMeibalane
01-05-2004, 04:19 AM
Originally posted by CubKilla
Have the Twins added anyone besides Guerrier? They're as pathetic as the White Sox.

The fact that Minnesota has done nothing to improve their ballclub convinces me that the Sox still have an excellent chance to win their division. The AL Central is so weak right now that it may come down the team that manages to sick the least, as opposed to playing the best, if that makes any sense.