PDA

View Full Version : DET signs rondell white


ScottyTheSoxFan
12-14-2003, 08:56 AM
white and vina now. not that i want any of those guys, but atleast they are making some moves.

link (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1685877)

anewman35
12-14-2003, 08:58 AM
Originally posted by ScottyTheSoxFan
white and vina now. not that i want any of those guys, but atleast they are making some moves.

link (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1685877)

As Kenny said, is it really good to make moves just for the sake of making moves? Especially if the moves are for players like this?

RedPinStripes
12-14-2003, 09:40 AM
Hey! Were keeping Buehrle and we got URIBE!!! We've added so much this offseason.

:ohno
Still waiting..........

ChiWhiteSox1337
12-14-2003, 10:23 AM
Already mentioned in another thread, but now Hawk will be able to say, "Frank Thomas, Carlos Lee, Magglio Ordonez and the Chicago White Sox take on Rondell White, Fernando Vina and the Detroit Tigers."

RKMeibalane
12-14-2003, 11:30 AM
:KW

"Zzzz..."

MHOUSE
12-14-2003, 11:38 AM
2 years $6 million seems really high for Rondell White. Reggie Sanders still available, but i don't want either of these guys.

guillen4life13
12-14-2003, 03:13 PM
Originally posted by RKMeibalane
:KW

"Zzzz..."


I think it's really more like this:

:KW
"I need money to pay players worth having on team, and I am not being provided with resources to do so."

:reinsy
"Not my fault!"

And us fans are left to cry.

doublem23
12-14-2003, 05:17 PM
Damn, I can't believe I'm saying "Phew, I'm glad we're not having their offseason," but I think I can say that about Detroit. Has White played in 120+ games in his career? I guess they're just going for 100... losses.

jeremyb1
12-14-2003, 05:31 PM
White's real good, he's just never healthy. I'd like him but not for 3 million per season.

red faber
12-15-2003, 03:46 AM
Originally posted by anewman35
As Kenny said, is it really good to make moves just for the sake of making moves? Especially if the moves are for players like this?


is it good to do nothing for the sake of doing nothing???????