DrCrawdad
08-31-2003, 11:20 PM
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/media/thumbnails/columnist/2003-05/7622751.jpg
...Perhaps back in the late '30s, when there were consistently good teams on both sides of town...
For the White Sox, the 30's were good, depending on your definition of good.
WHITE SOX
1930 62-92 7th
1931 56-97 8th
1932 49-102 7th
1933 67-83 6th
1934 53-99 8th
1935 74-78 5th
1936 81-70 3th
1937 86-68 3th
1938 65-83 6th
1939 85-69 4th
According to me, that plain stinks.
The 1930's were good for the Cubs with 3 NL Pennants and three 2nd place finishes.
...Perhaps back in the late '30s, when there were consistently good teams on both sides of town...
For the White Sox, the 30's were good, depending on your definition of good.
WHITE SOX
1930 62-92 7th
1931 56-97 8th
1932 49-102 7th
1933 67-83 6th
1934 53-99 8th
1935 74-78 5th
1936 81-70 3th
1937 86-68 3th
1938 65-83 6th
1939 85-69 4th
According to me, that plain stinks.
The 1930's were good for the Cubs with 3 NL Pennants and three 2nd place finishes.