Lip Man 1
07-28-2003, 12:05 AM
A pennant race, first time since September 2000. I LOVE IT!
Now we'll know one way or another over the next 16 games versus Kansas City, Seattle, Oakland, and Anaheim.
The Sox can NOT get swept this week in K.C. and they can NOT get swept in Seattle where they have been brutal the past two plus seasons!
Rick Morrissey of the Tribune has a column that just came out asking the same questions as many of us here at WSI. A sample (it's a looonnnggg column!):
We've been hearing for months now that it's only a matter of time before the Royals go away. This is based on the time-worn theory that, OK, every dog has its day, but the yapping Royals—are you kidding me?
Yeah, that time-worn theory.
That the collapse hasn't happened 103 games into the season would seem to suggest that if the White Sox are serious about the American League Central race, they will need to take care of the Royals this week in Kansas City.
A minimum of two victories in the three-game series
The Sox are the more talented team, but you could say that about most teams the Royals have faced this season.
This is the chance for the underachievers to finally achieve.
The Sox's nine victories in their past 10 games have been nice, but the current success has come against B-list teams and mostly at home. Think about that: The Royals, comfortable in their own skin, have no more reason to be worried about the Sox than they would about any other team these days.
Well, the Royals are good, for starters. They beat the Sox three times to open the season, spawning an identity crisis in the Sox that lasted months.
This is pretty simple. The Royals seem to understand that the Central games matter more. By beating the Tigers 5-1 Sunday, their record against division opponents is 32-11. No team has a better division winning percentage. The Sox are 27-24 in Central games.
Starting Tuesday, that gap doesn't matter so much if the Sox can take what they learned in batting-practice games against Detroit, Cleveland, Toronto and Tampa Bay and apply it against the only team that matters right now.
There are any number of reasons for the Sox to believe they eventually will take over first place.
But that's all paper stuff, and the Sox are the kings of looking good on paper.
Are the Royals for real?
I have a more relevant question for you: Are the Sox for real?
This is a maddening team, up one moment and down the next, like a needle on a lie-detector test. True or false: You believe in this team. If you do, you're a trusting soul. Some of us need more evidence.
To know what you're going to get from the Sox from series to series would be a miracle. To watch them take two of three from Kansas City would be enough for now.
This is where it starts. Against a serious team. A for-real team. What else matters?
The next series matters. In Seattle. Against a really for-real team."
Now we'll know one way or another over the next 16 games versus Kansas City, Seattle, Oakland, and Anaheim.
The Sox can NOT get swept this week in K.C. and they can NOT get swept in Seattle where they have been brutal the past two plus seasons!
Rick Morrissey of the Tribune has a column that just came out asking the same questions as many of us here at WSI. A sample (it's a looonnnggg column!):
We've been hearing for months now that it's only a matter of time before the Royals go away. This is based on the time-worn theory that, OK, every dog has its day, but the yapping Royals—are you kidding me?
Yeah, that time-worn theory.
That the collapse hasn't happened 103 games into the season would seem to suggest that if the White Sox are serious about the American League Central race, they will need to take care of the Royals this week in Kansas City.
A minimum of two victories in the three-game series
The Sox are the more talented team, but you could say that about most teams the Royals have faced this season.
This is the chance for the underachievers to finally achieve.
The Sox's nine victories in their past 10 games have been nice, but the current success has come against B-list teams and mostly at home. Think about that: The Royals, comfortable in their own skin, have no more reason to be worried about the Sox than they would about any other team these days.
Well, the Royals are good, for starters. They beat the Sox three times to open the season, spawning an identity crisis in the Sox that lasted months.
This is pretty simple. The Royals seem to understand that the Central games matter more. By beating the Tigers 5-1 Sunday, their record against division opponents is 32-11. No team has a better division winning percentage. The Sox are 27-24 in Central games.
Starting Tuesday, that gap doesn't matter so much if the Sox can take what they learned in batting-practice games against Detroit, Cleveland, Toronto and Tampa Bay and apply it against the only team that matters right now.
There are any number of reasons for the Sox to believe they eventually will take over first place.
But that's all paper stuff, and the Sox are the kings of looking good on paper.
Are the Royals for real?
I have a more relevant question for you: Are the Sox for real?
This is a maddening team, up one moment and down the next, like a needle on a lie-detector test. True or false: You believe in this team. If you do, you're a trusting soul. Some of us need more evidence.
To know what you're going to get from the Sox from series to series would be a miracle. To watch them take two of three from Kansas City would be enough for now.
This is where it starts. Against a serious team. A for-real team. What else matters?
The next series matters. In Seattle. Against a really for-real team."