Fire Manuel? It Ain't Gonna Happen!

[TornLabrum]

And the reason is simple: He's under contract through 2004, and The Chairman isn't going to pay two managers for nearly two years. Period.

(I'm hoping if I say this often enough, I'll influence the baseball gods to do just the opposite of what I predict, as they always do.)

[voodoochile]

Originally posted by TornLabrum
And the reason is simple: He's under contract through 2004, and The Chairman isn't going to pay two managers for nearly two years. Period.

(I'm hoping if I say this often enough, I'll influence the baseball gods to do just the opposite of what I predict, as they always do.)

Go, Hal! Keep that streak alive... :)

[Daver]

Originally posted by TornLabrum
And the reason is simple: He's under contract through 2004, and The Chairman isn't going to pay two managers for nearly two years. Period.

(I'm hoping if I say this often enough, I'll influence the baseball gods to do just the opposite of what I predict, as they always do.)

They could easily replace Manuel and not add a cent to the payroll,they did it with Nardi.

[MRKARNO]

Originally posted by TornLabrum
And the reason is simple: He's under contract through 2004, and The Chairman isn't going to pay two managers for nearly two years. Period.

(I'm hoping if I say this often enough, I'll influence the baseball gods to do just the opposite of what I predict, as they always do.)

Well they're probably already paying the person who would replace Manuel because it's probably Wally backman