View Full Version : Chicago Ranked at Bottom of Sports Cities
01-05-2003, 04:22 PM
As per espn (and phil rogers), San Fran ranked #1. We finish 30 of 33... Nice mention of the White Sox having the best quarterback in the city (Joe Borchard). Can't anyone here play this game? (http://espn.go.com/page2/s/rogers/021231.html)
Lip Man 1
01-05-2003, 07:48 PM
No surprise is it? You get what you pay for in sports and Chicago owners aren't exactly breaking the bank are they?
01-05-2003, 08:07 PM
At least we now have stats to back up our sufferring. Yippee!!
01-05-2003, 09:31 PM
Well, when you have Tags like-
You are in trouble.
01-06-2003, 12:08 AM
How in the world can a city with two pro sports teams be ranked number one?
Lip Man 1
01-06-2003, 01:21 AM
I think they probably combined the Bay Area into a single unit. That means you have two baseball, two football, a basketball and a hockey team plus Stanford.
01-06-2003, 10:13 AM
I read another article by phil Rodgers that said the White Sox have a pretty good chance this upcoming season because they have 3 starting pitchers who were 30/190(starts/innings) last year.He said one more workhorse and we should be favorites to win the division.I totally agree.I would love to have Vasquez but not at any price.Suppan would be better than nothing.
01-06-2003, 04:57 PM
I really like Phil Rogers because he's not blatantly biased towards the flubs and because he manages to be generally optimistic while not overratting the Sox (after 2000) and seeing the Cubs for what they are (during 2001). Also, he has really cool intro music on his appearences on AM 1000 on the late night show (who needs sleep with programming like that).
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.