PDA

View Full Version : Best hit a guy in a Cubs jersey will have all year?


doublem23
04-06-2014, 05:35 PM
Welcome to Wrigleyville

9G-XpJqmhn0

The fun starts around the 8 second mark

Railsplitter
04-06-2014, 10:22 PM
Taking off part of mascot's costume is like taking the mask of that ol' Lone Ranger

DumpJerry
04-06-2014, 10:47 PM
Taking off part of mascot's costume is like taking the mask of that ol' Lone Ranger
Technically, he's an unofficial mascot. (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-unofficial-cubs-mascot-says-he-was-provoked-in-wrigleyville-bar-punching-incident-20140406,0,6690294.story)

He, his brother and third guy are losers who collect tips from people who take pictures with them. The Cubs have asked them to stop doing this. I think this will force the Cubs to be more aggressive in their efforts.

doublem23
04-06-2014, 10:58 PM
Technically, he's an unofficial mascot. (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-unofficial-cubs-mascot-says-he-was-provoked-in-wrigleyville-bar-punching-incident-20140406,0,6690294.story)

He, his brother and third guy are losers who collect tips from people who take pictures with them. The Cubs have asked them to stop doing this. I think this will force the Cubs to be more aggressive in their efforts.

I know they definitely have security chase them away now if they're in the vicinity of Wrigley.

DumpJerry
04-06-2014, 11:11 PM
I know they definitely have security chase them away now if they're in the vicinity of Wrigley.
I expect a cease and desist letter from the Cubs' lawyer is already in the mail. This guy is using their trademark without their permission in a manner which reflects negatively on the organization (most people would not know he is not affiliated with the team). This is different from an instance when a fan wears a jersey and does something stupid. The fan wearing the jersey is not engaged in activity which gives, or is designed to give, the impression that s/he is sanctioned by the team.

They will threaten them with a lawsuit that will cause their unborn grandchildren to file for bankruptcy to get out of the judgment. Such a suit would have a 50/50 chance of succeeding, but the expense of fighting it won't be cheap.

ZombieRob
04-06-2014, 11:27 PM
Good for them. Change the Logo a bit and there's not a thing the Cubs owners can do. Wrigley Fields jurisdiction ends at the sidewalk. I know this for having worked for them for years. Always a good day when a Hipster get a punch in the face by an angry mascot.

Brian26
04-06-2014, 11:34 PM
What bar is that?

doublem23
04-06-2014, 11:44 PM
What bar is that?

John Barleycorn

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Video-Captures-Billy-Cub-Punching-Man-Who-Removes-Costumes-Head-254097611.html

doublem23
04-06-2014, 11:53 PM
I expect a cease and desist letter from the Cubs' lawyer is already in the mail. This guy is using their trademark without their permission in a manner which reflects negatively on the organization (most people would not know he is not affiliated with the team). This is different from an instance when a fan wears a jersey and does something stupid. The fan wearing the jersey is not engaged in activity which gives, or is designed to give, the impression that s/he is sanctioned by the team.

They will threaten them with a lawsuit that will cause their unborn grandchildren to file for bankruptcy to get out of the judgment. Such a suit would have a 50/50 chance of succeeding, but the expense of fighting it won't be cheap.

Oh, they already have

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Cubs-vs-Billy-216100291.html

Tragg
04-07-2014, 02:26 AM
Now that was funny.

gobears1987
04-07-2014, 03:09 AM
The idiot deserved to get punched for that.

white sox bill
04-07-2014, 08:05 AM
Are cub fans claiming thats really a Sox fan thats causing the problem?

cub killer
04-07-2014, 08:29 AM
Because of this incident, they can now add more lyrics to this song

dTENFPl0qcQ

SaltyPretzel
04-07-2014, 09:18 AM
Good for them. Change the Logo a bit and there's not a thing the Cubs owners can do. Wrigley Fields jurisdiction ends at the sidewalk. I know this for having worked for them for years. Always a good day when a Hipster get a punch in the face by an angry mascot.

Are you talking about that poor kid from Indiana whose parents gave them that name?

I'd rather be named Sue.

SOXPHILE
04-07-2014, 11:46 AM
I know they definitely have security chase them away now if they're in the vicinity of Wrigley.

While those guys are idiots, unless they are actually on Wrigley property, Cubs security can't chase them away. If they're walking across the street from the park or in one of the many bars in the area, the Cubs can't do anything. The bar owners can decide if they want the guy in there or not.

DumpJerry
04-07-2014, 12:09 PM
While those guys are idiots, unless they are actually on Wrigley property, Cubs security can't chase them away. If they're walking across the street from the park or in one of the many bars in the area, the Cubs can't do anything. The bar owners can decide if they want the guy in there or not.
They can because of the intellectual property rights the Cubs own. I know, I know, the words "intellectual" and "Cubs" usually don't belong in the same sentence. They are not being chased away because they are trespassing on someone else's property, but because the Cubs have to defend their intellectual property (Bayer failed to do that with "Aspirin" and lost the ability to prevent other companies from using the word to describe their product which is like Bayer's product).

jdm2662
04-07-2014, 12:16 PM
They can because of the intellectual property rights the Cubs own. I know, I know, the words "intellectual" and "Cubs" usually don't belong in the same sentence. They are not being chased away because they are trespassing on someone else's property, but because the Cubs have to defend their intellectual property (Bayer failed to do that with "Aspirin" and lost the ability to prevent other companies from using the word to describe their product which is like Bayer's product).

Is he making money off of their product? I know that's how they dinged the roof top owners. Obviously, I get the fact he can't be using the Cubs logo, brand, etc.

DumpJerry
04-07-2014, 01:48 PM
Is he making money off of their product? I know that's how they dinged the roof top owners. Obviously, I get the fact he can't be using the Cubs logo, brand, etc.
Whether someone is making money off another's intellectual property is irrelevant. The issue is that the property belongs to the owner, the Cubs, and it cannot be used, except in some very limited settings, by someone else.

WhiteSox5187
04-07-2014, 01:52 PM
Whether someone is making money off another's intellectual property is irrelevant. The issue is that the property belongs to the owner, the Cubs, and it cannot be used, except in some very limited settings, by someone else.

What about this is the intellectual property of the Cubs? Are you talking about the jersey and helmet? Because that's probably a flimsy case at best.

Chez
04-07-2014, 02:10 PM
Southpaw would kick his ass!

SOXPHILE
04-07-2014, 02:17 PM
They can because of the intellectual property rights the Cubs own. I know, I know, the words "intellectual" and "Cubs" usually don't belong in the same sentence. They are not being chased away because they are trespassing on someone else's property, but because the Cubs have to defend their intellectual property (Bayer failed to do that with "Aspirin" and lost the ability to prevent other companies from using the word to describe their product which is like Bayer's product).

OK, so hypothetically, lets say one of these idiots is dressed in the costume and are at John Barleycorns/Red Vines/Bar Louie, etc. A couple of "heavies" from the Chicago Cubs can come in to the bar, which is private property, not Cubs property, and kick him out ? I really don't think that's true. They can hand him a cease and desist letter, telling him to stop running around dressed like a Cub, but that's about it. They can't physically remove him. The owners of the bar can. I would just think the Cubs would pressure the owners of the bars not to let the guy in.

DumpJerry
04-07-2014, 02:35 PM
What about this is the intellectual property of the Cubs? Are you talking about the jersey and helmet? Because that's probably a flimsy case at best.

It is actually very strong. The logos on the jersey and helmet are registered trademarks. The use of the logos is controlled by MLB and the Cubs.

OK, so hypothetically, lets say one of these idiots is dressed in the costume and are at John Barleycorns/Red Vines/Bar Louie, etc. A couple of "heavies" from the Chicago Cubs can come in to the bar, which is private property, not Cubs property, and kick him out ? I really don't think that's true. They can hand him a cease and desist letter, telling him to stop running around dressed like a Cub, but that's about it. They can't physically remove him. The owners of the bar can. I would just think the Cubs would pressure the owners of the bars not to let the guy in.
They can't kick them out of Barleycorm, they can make them stop doing what they're doing with the logos, however. If they don't stop, the Cubs' potential damages in a lawsuit keep increasing.

WhiteSox5187
04-07-2014, 06:13 PM
It is actually very strong. The logos on the jersey and helmet are registered trademarks. The use of the logos is controlled by MLB and the Cubs.


I know you're a lawyer so you would know this better than me, but by that logic couldn't the Cubs (or any entity with a registered trademark) sue anyone who wears a Cubs logo and does anything they disapprove of?

DSpivack
04-07-2014, 06:50 PM
I know you're a lawyer so you would know this better than me, but by that logic couldn't the Cubs (or any entity with a registered trademark) sue anyone who wears a Cubs logo and does anything they disapprove of?

No:

I expect a cease and desist letter from the Cubs' lawyer is already in the mail. This guy is using their trademark without their permission in a manner which reflects negatively on the organization (most people would not know he is not affiliated with the team). This is different from an instance when a fan wears a jersey and does something stupid. The fan wearing the jersey is not engaged in activity which gives, or is designed to give, the impression that s/he is sanctioned by the team.

They will threaten them with a lawsuit that will cause their unborn grandchildren to file for bankruptcy to get out of the judgment. Such a suit would have a 50/50 chance of succeeding, but the expense of fighting it won't be cheap.

Brian26
04-07-2014, 08:16 PM
When are they doing to send the Cease & Desist to Ronnie Woo Woo?

DumpJerry
04-07-2014, 11:16 PM
When are they doing to send the Cease & Desist to Ronnie Woo Woo?
Who do you think keeps buying him tickets to games at The Urinal and Comiskey, not to mention Spring Training games? Who paid for his new teeth which are perfectly aligned and pearly white?:wink: I don't know, but he certainly has friends in high places......

Woo Woo probably creates an atmosphere the Cubs want to promote (harmless cheering on the team) vs. these clowns who are trying to get tips and seem to get upset when stiffed.

white sox bill
04-08-2014, 12:04 PM
When are they doing to send the Cease & Desist to Ronnie Woo Woo?
If they won't, I will...:tongue: that guy is offensive!

doublem23
04-09-2014, 10:23 AM
I really do think the Tribune revels in the misery of the Ricketts

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-battling-mascot-sullivan-cubs-spt-0409-20140409,0,7368290.story