PDA

View Full Version : Would the Sox bring Magglio Ordonez back?


Viva Medias B's
11-09-2010, 10:22 PM
In spite of the acrimony that occurred when he left, and the rancor between him and Ozzie Guillen in 2006, do you see the White Sox bringing Magglio Ordonez back to the organization?

doublem23
11-09-2010, 10:25 PM
I'm not really interested in a 37-year-old OF coming off a severe ankle injury.

DumpJerry
11-09-2010, 11:09 PM
No.

RadioheadRocks
11-09-2010, 11:22 PM
That would be a "no".

GoGoCrede
11-09-2010, 11:27 PM
What's behind door number two?

soxnut1018
11-09-2010, 11:35 PM
http://local-static1.forum-files.fobby.net/forum_attachments/0011/7216/yeah_no_carmex.jpg

Yeah...no.

LITTLE NELL
11-10-2010, 05:37 AM
Why?

DrCrawdad
11-10-2010, 06:58 AM
In spite of the acrimony that occurred when he left, and the rancor between him and Ozzie Guillen in 2006, do you see the White Sox bringing Magglio Ordonez back to the organization?

As a player? No, don't see that happening. However the obstacle is probably not as much about Ordonez exit and acrimony but the fact that probably has little to offer the Sox.

Old (for a ballplayer), injured and expensive. No thanks.

MtGrnwdSoxFan
11-10-2010, 08:19 AM
He's already on the team, except he's 8 years younger and his name is Carlos Quentin.

gobears1987
11-10-2010, 08:38 AM
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:MiA9a24bBWhlOM:http://www.filmbuffonline.com/InRemembrance/Images/JohnVernon.jpg&t=1

Old, injured, and stupid is no way to get a contract son.

LITTLE NELL
11-10-2010, 08:59 AM
He's already on the team, except he's 8 years younger and his name is Carlos Quentin.

TCQ is no Mags in his prime.

guillen4life13
11-10-2010, 09:01 AM
Seriously, Mags was way better than TCQ in almost every aspect of the game except maybe power, though he wasn't that far behind in that regard.

That said, no on Mags.

MtGrnwdSoxFan
11-10-2010, 09:28 AM
TCQ is no Mags in his prime.

I was referring more to the injury-prone aspect that they both share rather than talent.

LoveYourSuit
11-10-2010, 10:02 AM
I was referring more to the injury-prone aspect that they both share rather than talent.


:scratch:Maggs was never injury prone.

He had that one freak injury, that's all.


Meanwhile Quentin is :
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/touchstone_pictures/unbreakable/samuel_l__jackson/unbreakable.jpg

Brian26
11-10-2010, 11:19 AM
:scratch:Maggs was never injury prone.

He had that one freak injury, that's all.


Mags played almost seven years for the Sox before Willie Harris ran into him and blew out his knee. I can't remember him ever being on the DL.

doublem23
11-10-2010, 11:55 AM
:scratch:Maggs was never injury prone.

He had that one freak injury, that's all.


Meanwhile Quentin is :
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/touchstone_pictures/unbreakable/samuel_l__jackson/unbreakable.jpg

Mags played almost seven years for the Sox before Willie Harris ran into him and blew out his knee. I can't remember him ever being on the DL.

Maggs was a stallion of health when he was here, but he's been a little brittle since signing with Detroit. Maybe not on the TCQ-scale, but he's no longer a workhorse like he once was.

roylestillman
11-10-2010, 12:19 PM
Oh-Eeee-No. Maaagglio.

downstairs
11-10-2010, 03:56 PM
Yes, I'm sure they'll bring him back.

...during an old-timers game in 20 years.