Which former Chicago manager has a better chance w/ their team?

[the1tab]

Jerry Manuel vs. Jim Riggleman... two guys that had pretty big highs and pretty low bottoms w/ the Sox & Cubs respectively...

I wouldn't want either job, but I get the feeling the market in Seattle makes it a little easier to take your time righting the ship than in Flushing NY

[JohnTucker0814]

How is not Manual??? He has the better team, the Mets are not going to be trading their players at the deadline... Riggleman has no chance! Really I doubt either of them are the managers next year anyhow!

[VeeckAsInWreck]

Manuel is an interim manager on a team that has more pressure to win than Seattle does. For that reason I voted for Riggleman.

[WhiteSoxJunkie]

Manuel has alot more talent on his team.

[Daver]

Dusty and the Reds may still surprise some people.

[Ziggy S]

Does Dusty B still live on the Dan Ryan. Dusty B proved he can not stand the test of time and said time has made him a corpse in a ditch. For it is written, Dusty B will die in a ditch.

[KenBerryGrab]

Gandhi, baby.

[soxinem1]

I say Manuel. Much better roster gives him more of a chance.

I doubt SEA has the ability to win 70 games even if Lou Piniella went back.

[Rockin Robin]

Aww I was hoping to open this thread and read about the return of Terry Bevington.

Bummer.

[Frontman]

Manuel by far. He has the talent with the Mets, if he could only get them to gel; whereas the Mariners need......alot.

[Tragg]

I thought Riggelman did a good job with the Cubs.