PDA

View Full Version : Who will end up with the worst record in baseball?


Chicken Dinner
04-22-2008, 01:28 PM
My money is on the Pirates. They look pathetic

skottyj242
04-22-2008, 01:29 PM
I'm gonna go with the Nationals.

Hokiesox
04-22-2008, 01:37 PM
Definitely a 2 horse race between the Nats and Bucs. I've had the displeasure of being able to watch the Nats on TV, they're Bad with a capital B.

TDog
04-22-2008, 01:45 PM
I hope the Pirates continue to look pathetic when they play the Sox. They actually looked like a feisty team in their extra-innings losses to the Cubs in Pittsburgh. But a big loser has to have hard fought losses along the way. I wonder if giving up 36 runs in three games will be the low point in their season.

The Rays and Rangers may end up vying for the worst record in the American League. But it's only April. The season has more than five months left and a lot of weird stuff happens. If it's weird enough that the correct answer to the poll question is Detroit or Cleveland, the season won't be all bad.

asindc
04-22-2008, 02:34 PM
Definitely a 2 horse race between the Nats and Bucs. I've had the displeasure of being able to watch the Nats on TV, they're Bad with a capital B.

Yes they are. The Nats are more like a AAAA team at this point.

doublem23
04-22-2008, 02:38 PM
The Giants are absolutely brutal, and they play in a very loaded division.

Marqhead
04-22-2008, 03:00 PM
I would pick the Giants because of their brutal everyday lineup, but they actually have a few decent young pitchers. The Nats rotation is a complete joke, and none of them should even be in the majors. They are my pick.

DSpivack
04-22-2008, 04:54 PM
I voted for the Giants. At least the Nats have some decent young hitters; while the Giant have some pitching, the NL West is a brutal division and they have zero quality hitters in their lineup.

TDog
04-22-2008, 05:09 PM
The Giants are absolutely brutal, and they play in a very loaded division.

You're right. The Giants play in probably the toughest division in baseball. They do have some good young pitching, which can be inconsistent from time to time, but they do seem on their way to losing every time out.

Their slogan this year is "All Out, All Season," probably in contrast to the Bonds years when he didn't particularly feel like playing every day. They look like Angry Young Men, with more pitching and less hitting.

DSpivack
04-22-2008, 05:30 PM
You're right. The Giants play in probably the toughest division in baseball. They do have some good young pitching, which can be inconsistent from time to time, but they do seem on their way to losing every time out.

Their slogan this year is "All Out, All Season," probably in contrast to the Bonds years when he didn't particularly feel like playing every day. They look like Angry Young Men, with more pitching and less hitting.

What a terrible, and yet unintentionally hilarious, slogan.

Sockinchisox
04-22-2008, 05:39 PM
Orioles

NardiWasHere
04-22-2008, 05:42 PM
I'm embarrassed to say... but I picked the Pirates to finish second in the NL Central :redface:. It was a mini-sleeper pick, but... aw, who am I kidding, I'm an idiot.

Was I temporarily insane?

EMachine10
04-22-2008, 06:08 PM
Nasty Nats.

I actually like the Pirates as a sleeper, too.

Railsplitter
04-22-2008, 08:05 PM
The Cubs, of course.

SOXfnNlansing
04-22-2008, 08:25 PM
flubs

Optipessimism
04-22-2008, 10:46 PM
Giants. No offense to speak of, and while they have some pitching, Lincecum's delivery is scary, Lowry has been awful and is no guarantee to be a whole lot better after surgery, and Zito stopped being Zito. In addition, they play in the best division in the NL.

MrRoboto83
04-23-2008, 12:13 AM
Orioles

Agree

PKalltheway
04-23-2008, 03:39 PM
Nationals. They're a really sorry bunch this year. I wouldn't be suprised if they ended up losing 100 or more games.

TDog
04-23-2008, 03:44 PM
Nationals. They're a really sorry bunch this year. I wouldn't be suprised if they ended up losing 100 or more games.


I would be surprised if the Giants don't.

tstrike2000
04-25-2008, 01:35 PM
I'll go with the Nats at this point. For a team that needs a lot of pitching help, it must be bad when Jason Bergmann, who was one of their SP's was sent down to AAA.

FedEx227
04-25-2008, 02:22 PM
I would be surprised if the Giants don't.

Just by virtue of having Matt Cain and Lincecum I don't think they'll be 100-loss bad, still awful but it takes a real commitment of total team suckness to get to that mighty plateau, especially in the NL.

palehozenychicty
04-25-2008, 02:26 PM
The Nasty Nats are just that. They have absolutely NO pitching whatsoever.

FedEx227
04-25-2008, 02:29 PM
The Nasty Nats are just that. They have absolutely NO pitching whatsoever.

Yeah exactly, their best two pitchers from last year Bergmann and Patterson are both off the team.

DumpJerry
04-25-2008, 04:06 PM
First of all, how can anyone in their right mind consider the Giants to end up with the worse record in MLB? They have Aaron Rowand!

I'm surprised no mention has been made yet of the Royals. After a fast start, they have sunk to the bottom. Seven game losing streak as we speak......

Steelrod
04-26-2008, 07:27 AM
Giants!
It's all about security, A-Row!